could relativity proof have been falsified?

[raaaid]

in 1919 in a sun eclipse an stronomer verified an star by the sun has movd its position confirming realitivty and trun a guy with a very low iq according the iq tests he took into the most intelligent person of history

my question:

why they assumed the light bent due to gravity and not caused by teh sun helium huge atmosphere refraction?

confusing bs:



clear fact:



edit:

well since now on due to poular demand ill keep my ramblings to one thread

10 points to who spot whats wrong with this picture and whats going on with me in every forum:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3AxyrO7AfM

[swiss]

Originally Posted by raaaid

my question:

why they assumed the light bent due to gravity and not caused by teh sun helium huge atmosphere refraction?

Do you think it would work with planet without atmosphere(given it has enough mass) too?
Or a black hole?

[raaaid]

really im not sure if light is bent by gravity

in fact is a very touchy subject:

light should bent if looked at for being a particle and not bent when not looked at for being a wave

but what i find suspicious is why nobody brought down eisntein proof based on suns atmosphere refraction

i have two degrees and imo university kills the critic spirit and reinforces blind faith based on the authority criteria

i was taught one version here in spain on the maine incident that caused the american spanish war and the opposite in the states

posibly physics is the most subversive filed and the most manipulated by the stablishment

edit:

thinking about it better if light really bent by gravity shouldnt it be extreamly easy to locate blackholes by moving stars for bent starlight by the massive gravity of blackholes?

[raaaid]

im not bumping this is at the top for sake of order:

i reached this theory of gravity which this guy tells

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bd-QqKmVyfU

IF BLACKHOLES BENT LIGHT:

you and me are separated by a basketball that inflates

we tense a string by the edgeof the ball

the basketball inflating will hide the string light

then light is instant as the string

evrything is hapening now

causality is false both cause and effect are simultaneous

tt is posible, yesterday is now

[bongodriver]

Twitterrrrrrr!!!!.........faaaacceeebboooookk!!!!! !!

[raaaid]

Originally Posted by bongodriver

Twitterrrrrrr!!!!.........faaaacceeebboooookk!!!!! !!

i have no friends in facebook or twiter

should i buy the book how to make friends to that dirty bald headed fatt dumbaes

[bongodriver]

Why dont you ask people to friend you? even your family, now we know who to look for on FB I'm sure you will pick up some fans from here.

[raaaid]

if you give me areasonable reason to leave illexpreess my ideas thruogh facebook instead of here

one to saty, i have old virtual friends here

other sentences here are not limited to easy short messages as in facebook

my tweat of 9:06

im stdying culomb law:

the force to beat friction is independent of surface

[bongodriver]

if you give me areasonable reason to leave illexpreess my ideas thruogh facebook instead of here

You will know that everyone who listens to you on facebook is doing it willingly and isn't getting annoyed by you.

i have old virtual friends here

PM them and ask them to join you on facebook/twitter if they have it, or just keep i touch via email, technically you could do all your ramblings by mass email to all your disciples.

im stdying culomb law:

the force to beat friction is independent of surface

Many people here are not and have no particular interest in your studies either.

[raaaid]

im bending your mind into reading this so i annoy you

im limiting to a single thread ot dismulate