Why not pay every month to play COD!

ga_332 · #1 12-25-2011, 10:49 AM

ok see that games like WOW(diffrent game tho but my point) and Aces High(just the same series/Games) have to pay every month and both games very sucsessfull. This most be a god thing for both parts custemour and devenloper. If the game is not good, people would not add pay every month, and devenloper have to see that game is in top shape so that we pay every month

And every patch/secuel would off course be in the price

........

Feathered_IV · #2 12-25-2011, 11:10 AM

No thanks. I'd be fine with buying addons, large or small. But I'd not like to rent the game.

Tavingon · #3 12-25-2011, 12:29 PM

I would buy flyable plane dlc, £2.99.. no problem with that

SturmKreator · #4 12-25-2011, 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tavingon

I would buy flyable plane dlc, £2.99.. no problem with that

Yep that would be much better, pay for playing? naaa, I hate that bussines model.

Tavingon · #5 12-25-2011, 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SturmKreator

Yep that would be much better, pay for playing? naaa, I hate that bussines model.

Literally if they had a team who just made bonus planes for cash, I'd buy every single one.. my wallet is ready, its irritating they arent willing to try dlc to supliment the developments!

Aer9o · #6 12-25-2011, 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ga_332

ok see that games like WOW(diffrent game tho but my point) and Aces High(just the same series/Games) have to pay every month and both games very sucsessfull. This most be a god thing for both parts custemour and devenloper. If the game is not good, people would not add pay every month, and devenloper have to see that game is in top shape so that we pay every month

And every patch/secuel would off course be in the price

........

It this sone sesonal joke ...mate???

reaver · #7 12-25-2011, 01:11 PM

i will gladly make another financial contribution , if it helps finish this game. I will certainly buy upcoming battle of Moscow and any other expansions, but i wouldn't pay monthly fee simply because i am not playing cliffs of dover. Its is still (early) beta and i have better things to do that free beta testing.

But i must express my thanks to all fellow gamers who contribute by doing so

R.

ElAurens · #8 12-25-2011, 01:39 PM

I dropped RoF because of that dubious business model.

All it does is create a bunch of customers addicted to new planes, and makes developers focus on new aircraft rather than new scenario/content creation.

It works, sort of, for RoF because they never have to make a new map, or add much of any type of ground vehicle/campaign scenario content.

The model used by IL2, and now the new sim, has worked very well over the years. New aircraft and maps, plus many necessary ground objects/vehicles, all tied up in a cohesive package. Far better than RoF's shotgun approach where new aircraft seemingly appear willy nilly with no historical context.

MB_Avro_UK · #9 12-25-2011, 01:59 PM

I would be happy to pay for additions such as aircraft and ground objects. (Similar to RoF).

These items are far more complex than in the il21946 days and deserve our financial support,as indeed does the rest of the sim.

If you divide the amount of time you fly over the years with the cost, it makes sense.

I only flew co-ops with a team in il2 1946. As a host in forseeable CLOD we would of course need to have matching purchased aircraft/objects.

Best Regards,
MB_Avro.

ATAG_Dutch · #10 12-25-2011, 02:13 PM

I certainly wouldn't want to pay monthly.

But I've already said in another thread that I'd be willing to pay another full game price and more to get 'Cliffs' closer to a Battle of Britain sim.

As it stands, we'll need to wait for the Mediterranean theatre to emerge before getting any content that will enhance the existing game from a Battle of Britain perspective, such as The Royal Navy and a flyable Wellington.

They will remember the Royal Navy in the MTO, won't they.........?