Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads

Technical threads All discussions about technical issues

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-03-2011, 10:11 AM
=XIII=Shea =XIII=Shea is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Ireland
Posts: 236
Default Shadows on trees?

Hi guys i was just wondering is there anyway to turn of shadows on tree,s in config?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-03-2011, 10:37 AM
JG52Uther's Avatar
JG52Uther JG52Uther is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,358
Default

Not sure! Doesn't it come under 'shadows' in the settings, or is that just for aircraft?
What about the 'no trees' setting?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-03-2011, 11:07 AM
III/JG53_Don III/JG53_Don is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 219
Default

Thats the point for him I guess (and for me as well btw ^^)
If you enable shadows you enable ALL shadows in game. This means your cockpit shadow, aircraft shadow of your and the other planes, and shadows of ALL trees and buildings in your surroundings.
This is why shadows are such a tremendous hit for the performance. The option to turn on just the cockpit/aircraft shadows would help a lot for the performance I guess as you can rather disclaim the tree/building shadows as the ones from the planes.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-04-2011, 08:06 AM
banned banned is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 273
Thumbs down The tree thing is very very annoying

I had a fly tonight and came across a 109 coming towards me. I turned in behind him and saw him diving to the deck. The next thing I see is he is flying through the trees.
I kept above the tree line waiting for him to pop up. He just kept flying through those trees until he built up enough speed to exit and outclimb me.
His mate came in and filled me full of holes, which didn't bother me. I manged to land in a field.
The advice I got was 'turn off the trees'. It annoys me that I have to turn off the basics of the game to stop these buggers cheating. It sucks.
I hope, one day, they do something about this. It ruins the whole feel of the game when things like this happen.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-04-2011, 08:30 AM
Verhängnis Verhängnis is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: I come from a Sea, Up, Over. :)
Posts: 295
Default

If you want the massive FPS hit that will include tracking the damage systems and shadows of all the trees around you then fine, I don't see a problem. But for those of us who like FPS, it's quite fine how it is.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-04-2011, 09:22 AM
Feathered_IV's Avatar
Feathered_IV Feathered_IV is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,471
Default

It all seems a less than ideal solution. Not quite where I thought we'd be after all this time.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-04-2011, 09:47 AM
pupo162 pupo162 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,188
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by banned View Post
I had a fly tonight and came across a 109 coming towards me. I turned in behind him and saw him diving to the deck. The next thing I see is he is flying through the trees.
I kept above the tree line waiting for him to pop up. He just kept flying through those trees until he built up enough speed to exit and outclimb me.
His mate came in and filled me full of holes, which didn't bother me. I manged to land in a field.
The advice I got was 'turn off the trees'. It annoys me that I have to turn off the basics of the game to stop these buggers cheating. It sucks.
I hope, one day, they do something about this. It ruins the whole feel of the game when things like this happen.
im sorry to tell you this, but you might not be handling cheaters. I for one cnat run trees in game. so i have htem set to off. when i hit the deck, i have no idea where trees are suppose to be at.

Even a old 1946 trees option would be better than off. if trees were colidable.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-04-2011, 10:06 AM
banned banned is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 273
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pupo162 View Post
im sorry to tell you this, but you might not be handling cheaters. I for one cnat run trees in game. so i have htem set to off. when i hit the deck, i have no idea where trees are suppose to be at.

Even a old 1946 trees option would be better than off. if trees were colidable.
Yes, true mate. He probably wasn't cheating. Still annoying though.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-07-2011, 09:26 AM
NLS61 NLS61 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 218
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pupo162 View Post
im sorry to tell you this, but you might not be handling cheaters. I for one cnat run trees in game. so i have htem set to off. when i hit the deck, i have no idea where trees are suppose to be at.

Even a old 1946 trees option would be better than off. if trees were colidable.
Hi I would be interested to know if you are running 64 bit or 32?

Cheers,

Niels
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.