Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-04-2012, 01:11 PM
raaaid's Avatar
raaaid raaaid is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,329
Default i dont believe in chem trails but why so many planes fly over the cities

common sense would forbid planes flying over the cities but they do in consistent basis

so is it somehow enforced for the planes to fly over the cities?

for the record i dont believe at all the chem trail nonsense but this kinds of back it up

imho if they wanted to spread population control poisons they would do it with car fuel as they did with lead but this got me curious, any reason for planes flying over cities?
__________________
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e222/raaaid/fmkld-1.jpg2.4ghz dual core cpu
3gb ram
ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2

I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-04-2012, 02:21 PM
5./JG27.Farber 5./JG27.Farber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,958
Default

Because cities have airports?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-04-2012, 02:49 PM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raaaid View Post
common sense would forbid planes flying over the cities but they do in consistent basis

so is it somehow enforced for the planes to fly over the cities?

for the record i dont believe at all the chem trail nonsense but this kinds of back it up

imho if they wanted to spread population control poisons they would do it with car fuel as they did with lead but this got me curious, any reason for planes flying over cities?
Because they all carry nuclear bombs and the pilots are just waiting for the signal to go ahead and drop them, sheesh... you really really need to get your head checked out!
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-04-2012, 02:57 PM
Fjordmonkey Fjordmonkey is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Larvik, Norway
Posts: 350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raaaid View Post
common sense would forbid planes flying over the cities but they do in consistent basis

so is it somehow enforced for the planes to fly over the cities?
Look at where the airports were built in the first place, look at the area around them at the time they were built, and then look at how cities have grown between now and then. There's your answer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by raaaid View Post
for the record i dont believe at all the chem trail nonsense but this kinds of back it up

imho if they wanted to spread population control poisons they would do it with car fuel as they did with lead but this got me curious, any reason for planes flying over cities?
Common sense would make people not buy into every single idiotic conspiracy-theory and actually do something useful with their blithering brains. Maybe I'm asking too much here, but seriously: Come the *censored* on.

Sheesh. And people wonder why I've never had much faith in the human race at all, and why I quite honestly think that humans are an evolutionary dead end. One would think that after 4 million years of evolution, we'd be further along. But no, we're not. Hell, I'd say that the chemtrail-idiots, and many of the other conspiracytheorists out there, are deadset proof that we're descendants of primates, and that some humans are closer to our ancestors than others.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-04-2012, 03:42 PM
CWMV's Avatar
CWMV CWMV is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 758
Default

Eh our species hasnt been around too long, a few million years is still new kid on the block in geologic time.

AS to the OP, well, I mean that's where people go, to cities. Very few flights going to the middle of nowhere.
And why would common sense dictate that they avoid overflying cities? What am I missing?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by banned View Post
Just fix the friggin thing you boof heads. It's getting boring now. Only 11 people on the whole thing. Yawn.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-04-2012, 04:56 PM
raaaid's Avatar
raaaid raaaid is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,329
Default

planes shouldnt fly over cities for the risk of them falling

is not this the reason for airports to be far from cities, maybe 30 km?

they want us to think of cheim trials so we dont think of lead in gasoline or fluoride in water
__________________
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e222/raaaid/fmkld-1.jpg2.4ghz dual core cpu
3gb ram
ASUS Radeon EAH4650 DI - 1 GB GDDR2

I PREFER TO LOVE WITHOUT BEING LOVED THAT NOT LOVE AT ALL
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-04-2012, 05:15 PM
5./JG27.Farber 5./JG27.Farber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,958
Default

they dont put lead in gas anymore...

It was used as a lubricant. If you buy an old car you have to add lead substitute... Anyway lead is not that bad and it tastes nice
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-04-2012, 05:25 PM
Pudfark Pudfark is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 363
Default

Lead is an abrasive. New car engines wear less than old "leaded" ones.

Proof?
Conventional aircraft engines burn 100 octane leaded gas. Their TBO after, 60 years is the same. Why? They burn the same leaded abrasive fuel.

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-04-2012, 06:18 PM
swiss swiss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Zürich, Swiss Confederation
Posts: 2,266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raaaid View Post
is not this the reason for airports to be far from cities, maybe 30 km?
Airports were built outside cities for several reasons:
- they require a huge amount of land, hard to find in cities(and expensive)
- pollution and noise

Now, several decades later the airports are im the middle because the cities grew towards and around them.
The same is true for train stations btw.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-04-2012, 06:36 PM
5./JG27.Farber 5./JG27.Farber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,958
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pudfark View Post
Lead is an abrasive. New car engines wear less than old "leaded" ones.

Proof?
Conventional aircraft engines burn 100 octane leaded gas. Their TBO after, 60 years is the same. Why? They burn the same leaded abrasive fuel.

Whats TBO?

So you are telling me Lead is abrasive to Steel? What? Please explain.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.