|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Development takes too long I would scratch
the following a/c in the first release, and put them in later:
RAF flyables: Blenheim Mk.IV, Gladiator Mk.II RAF AI: Wellington Mk.IC, Cierva C.30A/Avro Rota Mk.I (autogyro) & Sunderland Mk.I Luftwaffe flyables: He-111 P-2, Ju-88 A-1 Luftwaffe + Aeronautica flyables: He-115, FIAT G.50, FIAT CR.42, FIAT BR.20M
__________________
Intel i7 970 6x3.2 ASUS Sabertooth X58 ASUS GTX580 Corsair 12GB 1600 Mhz OZC SSD 120GB |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Yet another self-proclaimed software developing and project organizing professional.
Welcome to the Club and take a number. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I estimate that 90% will fly Bf109, Bf110, any german bomber, Hurri or Spit when the games comes out. The Italians would be nice to have in a later (payable) add-on, not really necessary in first release. Their role was modest in BoB anyway. It assume that it costs a lot of time to make dynamic campaign for Italian fighter. But I could be wrong, as I said just a suggestion.
__________________
Intel i7 970 6x3.2 ASUS Sabertooth X58 ASUS GTX580 Corsair 12GB 1600 Mhz OZC SSD 120GB |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Yet another rude and unnecessary comment... How many software projects have you led?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
lol... so true
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
@ mazex & Roy
I knew you'd post some comment, nonsense or not. Indeed I have some knowledge about this, as I worked on several games and game-related projects so far, but *I* still can restrain myself from trying to teach professionals. Now go figure if your comments were the first or later. @ Bloblast You named the topic "Development takes too long I would scratch..." How do you know that? Care to share your wisdom about the current status with us? Other than that I must indeed conclude that you are pretending the project is in a deep crysis and you also pretend to know what to do to speed it up. (infact you even pretended to know what machines people will fly...) |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I think we could also lose the Spitfire,Hurricane,Me109,and 110 and concentrate on the grass.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
You do have knowledge that is of interest for this forum - but why don't you just take it a bit easy instead of stepping on peoples toes? This thread is an exellent example. Why did you post a rude answer like number two above for someone making a suggestion? If you do not agree with the poster then tell him why in a normal tone, instead of a flame like above. That does not bring this forum forward. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Bloblast knew full and well what kind of response he could get from posting a comment like that...
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
You really surprise me again and again. Again you give EXACTLY the reason I answered to this thread the way I did and it's really funny that your comment does exactly the same what you just damned so much.
Of course with your lengthy top secret knowledge of software development with millions of dollar budget, you took the suggestion seriously, didn't you? I bet you worked on Microsofts ME or Vista, right - LOL Sorry, now, seriously, what is your answer to that idea? You surely didn't come here to just flame me, did you? Should Oleg cancel these planes? Roy, same for you. What do you think about this really great idea? @JG52Uther I'd like to cancel all British planes for the ability to pick flowers after landing. Last edited by Feuerfalke; 06-04-2008 at 11:10 PM. |
|
|