|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
View Poll Results: Do you fly Clod or 1946 more? | |||
I only own CloD | 3 | 3.80% | |
I only own 1946 | 20 | 25.32% | |
I own both, I fly CloD more | 12 | 15.19% | |
I own both, I fly 1946 more | 44 | 55.70% | |
Voters: 79. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Do you own/fly CloD?
There is a poll in the CloD forum about 1946, it seems to me a reciprocal is a good idea.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Own both, play both now and then Offline
Cant be bothered with the MP thing right now on either..awaiting CoD patch |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
1946 = used
CLOD = franchise support, waiting for it to ripe and expand in theatres, objects, features and Planes. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Own both.
Play '46 regularly, CoD is currently uninstalled. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Got both. Haven't touched CloD for a couple of weeks.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Own 1946 (and other previous cd versions) only.
Don't have CoD, don't want it. Not unless it divorces itself from Steam, which I utterly loathe. And then from what I read it needs a ton of patching, and it's not really modable at all. I love 1946, but without mods it'd be pretty boring. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I played CloD a couple of times on near-to-max details and I'm not happy with the performance. My specs:
CPU: AMD FX4100 GPU: Asus HD 6950 4 GB of RAM It should work fine on max details on my PC, but it doesn't And it's interesting that I don't get as nice performance in 1946 as I thought as well. It's awesome only in the newer Call of Duty games.
__________________
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
I own it for some time now but flew it like 3-4 hours...
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
own both - play 46 maybe once in a while - CoD -never - unplayable for me dont want to waste the time to make it playable, I should not have to! very sad - fooled me once....
|
|
|