Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-09-2008, 08:50 PM
Al Schlageter Al Schlageter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 657
Default

In July 1944, Beaumont had his Wing using 150 fuel. At 500ft his a/c was doing 415mph.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-09-2008, 10:07 PM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ctrl E View Post
i agree that tempest should be fastest. i've been trying to outrun D9s at low altitude in spits v 109s thinking the tempest would be able to get away. won't do that again
Just keep it in the 1000 meter range and you'll be closer to the maximum speed in the stage 1 supercharger setting and be able to outrun almost everything. At sea level the FW190D-9 with MW50 (the 1945 model) is faster than pretty much everything...even the super fast La-7 is left in the dust at sea level.
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-10-2008, 11:10 AM
Brain32 Brain32 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Posts: 91
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by *Buzzsaw* View Post
The Tempest should be the fastest aircraft by far at low altitude, but the game does not model the +11 and +13 boost models, only the lesser produced early model.

As far as the TA-152C is concerned, only a TINY number flew, (compared to the thousands of Tempests) so any complaints about it should be taken with a LARGE grain of salt.
First TA-152C is not more rare than Tempest +13, actually atleast for the TA-152C you can find some real data instead of anegdotal data for the Tempest+13, talking about grains of salt lol.
Also please do not make me laugh with "thousands of Tempests" statement, all Tempests together ever produced don't even reach 1500 and that's throughout the poduction including all models MkV and MkII and MkVI as later variants. Not to mention that if my memory serves me correctly there was about 800 MkV's produced ever, note - EVER, not just during the war. For comparision there was 1805 FW190D9's produced before the war ended.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-10-2008, 01:10 PM
Al Schlageter Al Schlageter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 657
Default

You mean that calculated data for the DB603LA powered Ta152C?

Four prototypes of the Ta152C is a lot of a/c, be sure.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-10-2008, 02:13 PM
Brain32 Brain32 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Posts: 91
Default

Where did I say that's a lot?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-11-2008, 04:15 AM
*Buzzsaw* *Buzzsaw* is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 467
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brain32 View Post
First TA-152C is not more rare than Tempest +13, actually atleast for the TA-152C you can find some real data instead of anegdotal data for the Tempest+13, talking about grains of salt lol.
Also please do not make me laugh with "thousands of Tempests" statement, all Tempests together ever produced don't even reach 1500 and that's throughout the poduction including all models MkV and MkII and MkVI as later variants. Not to mention that if my memory serves me correctly there was about 800 MkV's produced ever, note - EVER, not just during the war. For comparision there was 1805 FW190D9's produced before the war ended.
Actually there were over 1700 Tempests built, including the Tempest II's. Of course, only the Tempest V flew in combat, (801 built) but then, the TA-152C never saw combat either. 452 Tempest II's were finished prior to the end of WWII, compared to 4 TA-152C. They could have been rushed into combat, but the Allies were already well in control of the war in the air, so these aircraft were kept back for more comprehensive testing.

And who mentioned 190D9's? Certainly not me. Although by the way, many of those 1800+ D9's ended up stuck on factory floors and never made it to the Staffel, because of lack of transportation and fuel to get them to the airfields.

As far as real data for the higher boosted Tempest, does this look like 'anecdotal' data?:



394 mph at sea level. And that is a Sabre IIA engine at 3700 rpm. The game's Tempest barely does 376 mph.

The Sabre IIB with only +11 boost reved to 3850 rpm and produced more hp.



410 mph at 4500 ft. The game's Tempest does 381 mph, 29 mph (46kph) slower.

Even the +11 boost Tempest would wipe the floor at low and medium alts with the TA's, or D9's.

Charts courtesy of Mike William's site.

Last edited by *Buzzsaw*; 12-11-2008 at 04:30 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-11-2008, 07:18 AM
Al Schlageter Al Schlageter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 657
Default

Quote:
Actually there were over 1700 Tempests built, including the Tempest II's.
Not according to Thomas and Shores in their book 'The Typhoon and Tempest Story'. They have 1399 Tempests built.

Contract B12148/39 - 300 built - Tempest Mk V
Contract ACTF/1640/C.23(a) - 2 built - prototypes
Contract ACTF/1876/C.23(a) - 100 built - Tempest Mk V
Contract ACTF/1986/C.23(a) - 2 built - prototypes
Contract ACTF/2439/C.23(a) - 50 built - Tempest I, built as Tempest II
Contract ACTF/2438/C.23(a) - 100 built - Tempest II
Contract ACTF/1876/C.23(a) - 200 built - Tempest Mk V
Contract ACTF/1876/C.23(a) - 142 built - Tempest Mk VI
Contract ACTF/2438/C.23(a) - 302 built - Tempest Mk II
Contract ACTF/1876/C.23(a) - 201 built - Tempest Mk V
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-11-2008, 10:11 AM
Codex Codex is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hoppers Crossing, Vic, Australia
Posts: 624
Default




Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-11-2008, 11:43 AM
Brain32 Brain32 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Posts: 91
Default

Still, not even calculated data for 13lbs, probably because both Sabre engines couldn't handle 150 grade fuel as it's well documented in every book dealing with Tempests.
Sure they did tests with it, but engines couldn't deal with it, that's why full 11lbs came for SabreIIb which did not need 150 grade fuel for 11lbs.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-11-2008, 12:56 PM
Al Schlageter Al Schlageter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 657
Default

Oh Brain, W/Cdr Roland Beamont had his Wing (3, 56, 486 Sqns) using 150 grade fuel and 11lb boost in July 1944.

Codex, nice chart but no Ta152 flew with the DB603L engine. The V 6, 7 and 8 used DB603E engines. Calculated numbers, they are.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.