Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > Men of War > Men of War: Assault Squad

Men of War: Assault Squad Sequel to the critically acclaimed real-time tactics game Men of War

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-12-2011, 03:34 PM
Bliep Bliep is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 15
Default On this game and it's faults in a non ranting way (yes it is possible)

Recently I acquired Men of War Assault Squad. I never played this series before and since I'm a fan of the strategy genre I thought I rectify that.

I popped the box installed the game, which would run after some troubleshooting, but which game just runs out of the box nowadays, eh.

So I selected skirmish, picked heroic and well landed my sorrow excuse for a butt on the first beach.

And there the fun started for my family. I think they learned more cursing words in 5 minutes then the rest of their whole life.

I have to admit I didn't understand the rants on this forum when I popped in to troubleshoot the game but I learned soon enough to understand the sentiment behind them. However I'm not one to rant like an idiot I rather hope to get my point across.

I'll point out some of the stuff that shouldn't be in a game like this but my main focus will be on the following. I hope the Devs seriously look into this and that someone is hired to work on an AI. Yup, an AI, not an approved AI cause sadly the one that is present at the moment is just not. It is not horrible, terrible and just not sucks it really is absent. And guys (and gals be there any) lets be honest the basis of any strategy game is an AI.

To my list of points:

Armour:

1. Ordering armour to retreat (under fire) actually makes them turn there arse on the enemy presenting a juicy target for quite a bit longer time then just using reverse.

2. Units persist in selecting their own shell type, while I tell them otherwise. And trust me you are not going to pop that Tiger using HE shells

3. Crew members die from ricochets, without a message to me while looking at the armour. They die from ricochets that couldn’t have hurt them in the first place.

4. Armour often gets stuck on damaged walls or stones in the field.

5. Most armour can drive their gun into a wall and shoot through it.

6. Enemy armour often decides to cruise a bit in front of my AT guns for whatever purpose

7. Enemy armour must have thermal vision cause of their see through smoke ability.

8. Enemy armour can shoot through 4 buildings cause they spotted my armour hiding behind a house there. Window glare anyone? Oh and no houses have no inside walls.

9. Enemy armour can shoot at my armour but I not at them cause the gun angle is to steep (same armour types).

10. The shortest distance to any point is a triangle through enemy territory.


Infantry:

1. Reloading while prone? No can do.

2. Like armour, when ordered to run for it. First you run to the enemy before running back so you give them ample time to shoot you in the head.

3. Trying to kill a Tiger with your BB gun, it's so much fun.

4. I know lying prone can be obnoxious but with that prowling Tiger around I wish you would stay prone and not take self initiative even if I disabled it all.

5. If you get shot at you could shoot back you know.

6. I know concrete walls can be threatening but you won't kill them or either the soldier behind it by emptying your whole ammo supply on them.

7. As medic you always take the lead when advancing on the enemy. They won't shoot at medical staff you know.

8. When peeking around a building and looking straight into a MG42 it is advised not to repeat the exercise.

9. When ordering troops from behind cover to advance they can form up while they walk not first mill around and walk away 10 minutes later.

10. If a sniper is targeting you, hmmmm. DUCK!


Other weapons of war:

1. Why oh why do half of my AT guns keep facing to the side of the map no matter which direction I point them.

2. I didn’t know you acquired the Carmegadon rights, but my static gun soldiers are not grannies to be run over.

3. HE shells do not punch through armour, I know it is hard to believe but you’ve AP ammo to do that.

4. A bazooka has a bit larger range then 5 meters

5. Why do I have to build 5 minutes on two sandbags with my grunt while a mortar setup magicks in their sandbags?

6. If I can direct control move a unit through a gap I’m sure the AI can manage. Ooh, not!

7. Trucks/AT gets stuck on slope of hills cause it seems to steep. The sissies need to floor it or munch on their steroids more I’d say.


General:

1. Units do no appear at the spot they when saved. This can be rather upsetting with nasty enemy units.

2. Units load with the wrong weapon selected.

3. Units lost their routing when loading and just stand up and wait.

4. Why is everything so more accurate and deadly in direct control?

5. The shortest and most save route is most often the straight line I order my troops on. However following this route seems non optional.

6. Can you tell me why that Tiger tank that is rolling up to me exactly knows where my units are and which are a threat? Even if I know 100% sure the AI shouldn’t be able to know I’ve my units located where they are.

7. The same goes for my units. How the hell do they know something is approaching without me spotting it yet. Must be the other side of the coin, the divine side that is.

8. Units that are incapacitated are loaded in a catatonic state and might block static weaponry from being remanned.


I hope this list made the reader smile a bit from time to time but all in it is a sad fact that this game has an exceptional eye for detail and versatility: your sniper keeps his rifle up out of the water while swimming and challenging level design but misses the boat fully on AI path finding and unit control. As a customer I pay you with my very hard earned money for what you advertised and that is sadly not a tech guide to WWII vehicles or a direct controlled miniature puppet shooter but a real time strategy game.

You will need to hire some adequate personnel to work on the AI. No offense if you did, I know how hard it is (and no this is no application for that function whatsoever) else this series is doomed to stay what it could have been, awesome.

Regards,

Dennis.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-12-2011, 08:37 PM
kane1's Avatar
kane1 kane1 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: CA.
Posts: 359
Default

That's a pretty impressive list coming from somebody that just started playing. I'd have to say that you pretty much covered most of the bugs. In regards to MoWAS, reinforcements are the key factor for having fun IMO. With a little tweak you can have enough points to have a blast playing this game, giving you plenty of reinforcements. I tweak the game a little more then that but I play to have fun. I've been playing these games for a few years and I love MoWAS. That's not to say that I don't give our cat a lesson in profanity.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-12-2011, 10:51 PM
CCCPeter's Avatar
CCCPeter CCCPeter is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 12
Default

hi Dennis,

very recognisable indeed, this list of yours. Also the swearing.... WHAT the BLEEP .

And yes, i wás smiling while reading..... but that's because for me the fun of playing this game
is so much greater than those annoying bugs.

I can spend hours on just cleaning up the battlefield, after a skirmish is completed... nice for practicing too.

It's a love/hate affair with me and Mowas, but learning to play it,
slowly makes the hate fade away (like old soldiers can do so graciously.....)

Don't forget that the devellopers are still working on improvements, and
if you get to know the game editor, you can tweak the game.

Here an example of what you can do (found it on this forum, dont remember who wrote it..) :

UNLIMITED MP
Start the mission u want to play, save in the beginning,

Then go to My documents>My games> MoW:AS>profiles>*YOUR NAME*>save>*THE NAME OF THE SAVE U DID IN BEGINNING OF MISSION*

Now, open mission.scn with notepad, and search for "{reinforcement" without quotes, then the first hit, scroll down and you see:


{reinforcements
{scoreTotal 2000}
{scoreCurrent 1002}
{"player_flag"
{state "-"}
{text ""}
{image rus_skirmish}
{hint ""}
{count -1}
{score 0}
{delay 0}

Edit the numbers in green to 99999 to get unlimited MP, and save the .scn file.
-------------------------

Love it or leave it, and if you love it, you learn it
In my humble opinion, mowas is awesome.

Happy gaming
Peter
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-13-2011, 08:54 AM
SpeedWolf's Avatar
SpeedWolf SpeedWolf is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 349
Default

A very good post indeed, is been a while since i read a good post,

you have cover most of the headache that all of us have in skirmish without going in to a rant, can you do a multiplayer review too?
__________________
[CENTER]
===
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-13-2011, 10:17 AM
nca_92 nca_92 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Argentina
Posts: 19
Default

If you can try to get the original Men of War. At least thats how I learned to play (and a little of the tutorial in Faces of war)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-13-2011, 12:51 PM
NoneSuch NoneSuch is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7
Default

The AI isn't the best and the game is really about microing your units individually. It can be a bit of a pain but I prefer it over CoH style squad control, just because you'll never pull off the same amazing stuff with that system as you can with controlling individual guys.

The majority of the things you've listed I feel aren't really bugs. Even shots which don't penetrate a tank are going to **** up the crew and cause serious injuries. If you want armour to reverse, shift click very close behind them and create a path.

Stuff like not being able to shoot the same place as AI armour? It sounds to me like they're on a different elevation, as I've never seen that happen.

So overall, the game really isn't about singleplayer. The skirmish missions are there for a bit of co-op, but the real heart of Assault squad is the MP.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-13-2011, 02:17 PM
CzaD CzaD is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 117
Default

Nice list, and the whole post is a bit funny. All you mentioned is pretty much true but ... you need to bear in mind this is not a traditional strategy game. This is real time tactics game and what it basically means is that your soldiers are as good as your micromanagement. Just watch this online game:



Instinct lost 8 men and killed 58 and an armoured vehicle, majority of the kills were made by just one paratrooper squad. So you see AI maybe not so great, but if you enjoy fast micromanagement you can pull off nice very impressive victories. Remember even the most insignificant infantry man can become a hero in this game.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-14-2011, 01:01 AM
kane1's Avatar
kane1 kane1 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: CA.
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NoneSuch View Post
So overall, the game really isn't about singleplayer. The skirmish missions are there for a bit of co-op, but the real heart of Assault squad is the MP.
Speaking as a gamer who never plays MP. I love this game in SP. It wasn't the type of Skirmish that I was hoping for but the game looks great, love all the units, been playing this since I got it(this and ToW2 and 3).
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-14-2011, 09:35 PM
Bliep Bliep is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 15
Default

I still didn't try out MP in this game and the main reason is the standard speed of the game (I play 1.5 so I can manage my units over the map) and the AI.

As with starcraft I/II the winner of the game is not the strategic/tactical superior player but the one with the best "clicking" skill (I watched some youtube movies for that conclusion). This game is a bit better then starcraft but still the difference is there so I highly doubt it'll be enjoyable for someone like me.

If the AI would be improved on some points I mentioned then maybe more tactical/strategic players stand a chance. Up till then I'll live with my 50 hours per skirmish game (heroic difficulty is a "real nasty female" )
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-09-2011, 11:30 AM
GenSmiffy GenSmiffy is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 9
Default

Hi everybody, I have just been reading the post presented by Bliep, and totally concur with the games bugginess. However I been searching for a game of quality of this ilk for some time and I think I have found it. To get to the point I am currently playing MOWAS Normandy skirmish game at normal level with Fog of War enabled. Ihave managed to control the first line of Germen defence but thats as far as I go. The main problems I encounter are the following. My solitary Sherman is easily knocked out, Chaffee tank reinforcements turn out to be One Hit Wonders, and waiting for my MP to refill seems to take an age and leaves my side vulnerable to counter attacks. Plus my first wave of troops have now all ran out of ammo "bugger" mI find all that micro management a bit of a pain. Then the German tanks stand off and pound my carefully planned defensive line. I'm open to suggestions. Also while I'm at it, on my version of the game (retail updated to patch 1,97) there are a couple of problems I hope you guys can help solve. 1. My spread out unit command does not work, and 2, My waypoint funtion does not work either. I,m so glad to get that off my chest .Thankyou.

Last edited by GenSmiffy; 11-09-2011 at 12:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.