Spitfire Mk IIa performance tests - Patch 1.07.18301

=AN=Felipe · #1 07-06-2012, 09:46 PM

Hello gentleman!

Is with a great honor to anoucce the new performance tests.

Hope you enjoy this tests!

Settings:

No winds, full fuel tanks, full loadout, pilot with parachute, radiator open, summer conditions, takeoff from Manston.

--------

Spitfire Ia , Spitfire Ia 100oct and hurris will come soon! We are working hard to colect all datas.

=AN=Felipe

=AN=Apache · #2 07-06-2012, 09:48 PM

Great job !!!

ATAG_Snapper · #3 07-06-2012, 09:57 PM

Looking forward to see this when I'm back at my PC, Felipe. My stupid iPad can't open .zip files.

=AN=Felipe · #4 07-06-2012, 10:02 PM

I post the same file in ATAG forum, but in PDF, only PDF without ZIP.

=AN=Apache · #5 07-06-2012, 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ATAG_Snapper

Looking forward to see this when I'm back at my PC, Felipe. My stupid iPad can't open .zip files.

What format opens ?

ATAG_Snapper · #6 07-06-2012, 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by =AN=Apache

What format opens ?

PDF works great on an iPad! Thanks to both if you can post it unzipped. =AN= rocks!

=AN=Felipe · #7 07-06-2012, 10:13 PM

No problem Snapper! If you still have some trouble send me an email, ill send the file direct to you ok?

felipe.borkowski@hotmail.com

cya!

=AN=Apache · #8 07-06-2012, 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ATAG_Snapper

PDF works great on an iPad! Thanks to both if you can post it unzipped. =AN= rocks!

Follow the link to the .pdf !!

http://www.4shared.com/office/As0Dlh...itfire_Mk.html

Kwiatek · #9 07-07-2012, 10:07 AM

As i expected CloD Spitfire MKIIa still way too slow both at deck and FTH. Still wrong power engine settings - mainfold pressure (boost) and RPMs. The same situation like with other RAF fighters. 109 regarding power engine settings is much better and realistic modeled - it should be only faster ab. 20 kph at the low alts then now.

I think with actuall FM and performacne of these planes there is no sense to make such detailed test and comparision before 1C will fix it and make it in much more accurate and historical way - if they ever do these.

=AN=Felipe · #10 07-07-2012, 03:41 PM

S! Kwiatek,

I work on a automatic excel sheet, so its no problem for us do this detailed tests. I agree with you and i hope the developers check this out, i know them have more programs to do this like scrips but the precision of this test should be arround +-3mph so its not a unaccurate teste, this is our present performance in cliffs of dover.

If the developers dont use this for consult and one more parameter of comparasion dont mind, we can use this to ask for a more realistc FM and charge to do this.

Thx for your post!