|
|
#22
12-09-2011, 04:03 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Fantastic stuff... but I would like to know if we will see the dynamic weather in COD as well!!!?
__________________
 Quote:
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL. CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10. INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4. 
|
|
#23
12-09-2011, 04:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I suppose we will not see the DW before the sequel... point 14.
|
|
#24
12-09-2011, 04:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow! I was missing these direct answers by the devs!
Luthier, I agree with your decision about the SpitfireMkIb. Anyway I think that you should still take "unreliability" in account in the weapon model since one day, hopeful, some fighters will use mk108s and mk103s. I don't understand the part about the structural limit: it's only about max speed and no G forces? If it's like that I fear that will have again dogfights defined constantly by 7G turns. It would be nice to have a fatigue model linked to the G forces. Thanks guys! My reaction to this update was something like this:  EDIT: please guys, can you avoid "BS" as short form for our friend BlackSix?... use something like "B6"...
__________________
 A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria. Last edited by 6S.Manu; 12-09-2011 at 04:13 PM.
|
|
#25
12-09-2011, 04:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
1C Team Questions and Requests
|
|
#26
12-09-2011, 04:19 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I never look a gift horse in the mouth. Like everyone here, I've bought the game; they've got my money. We're not exactly in a strong negotiating position here to ask or demand anything. There is nothing to be gained by them to give any tentative date for anything. We've already ruined that avenue by our past behaviour on this forum.
I do appreciate the effort they're making to fix this sim to what it should've been from the get go. Hopefully this sets the stage for them to garner future purchases from us for expansions such as War over Moscow, Malta/North Africa/Sicily, etc.
|
|
#27
12-09-2011, 04:29 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
S!
__________________
 | AFBs of CloD 2[/URL] |www.pumaszallas.hu i7 7700K 4.8GHz, 32GB Ram 3GHz, MSI GTX 1070 8GB, 27' 1920x1080, W10/64, TrackIR 4Pro, G940 Cliffs of Dover Bugtracker site: share and vote issues here
|
|
#28
12-09-2011, 04:30 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thanks Blacksix for taking the time and effort to do this...your work is very much appreciated.
As for the info given...Meh...almost no new information, apart from telling us the stuff Luthier has been talking about for the last few months is now months away or not even on the list.
__________________
Furbs, Tree and Falstaff...The COD killers... 
|
|
#29
12-09-2011, 04:44 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
|
|
#30
12-09-2011, 04:55 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I think this News?? Update?? is a new offense from Luthier (No offense BS, its not your fault).
I bought this broken game twice, in russian and in english languages, and I feel cheated every week, every friday when the next beta-beta-beta-patch doesnt arrive and Mr. Luthier is too busy for writing two lines explaining why. No screenshots, not a decent list of new features..NOTHING. And now, the ultimate insult: Seems that they have "moved" their effords to a "sequel", not even having finished the first part. My God, even the radio messages are a useless mess!! Weather engine? Nooo, moved to the sequel. C´mon!! Well, good luck with that one. I will not be cheated again. 
|
 |
|
|
I'm gathering he is saying in response that "no aircraft wont tear themselves apart due to over g but they will have more non visual damage effect process".
Linear Mode
