How many non-combat simmers will the Su-26 attract?

major_setback · #1 10-09-2012, 03:08 PM

I wonder how many non-combat simmers the Su-26 will attract.
The whole CoD game costs less now (9 pounds where I live) than some of the better FSX add-ons.

Actually the Su-26 add-on for FSX costs 15 pounds!!!
http://secure.simmarket.com/eaw-sukhoi-su-26.phtml

http://www.alabeo.com/index.php?acci...duct&correl=76

.

CaptainDoggles · #2 10-09-2012, 03:11 PM

None.

senseispcc · #3 10-09-2012, 03:14 PM

.
The SU-26m is nice to fly but not a Spitfire or a Hurricane so it was not for the SU-26m I did buy the game. I hope to fly the next generation of IL2 games with the quality of COD planes, the YAK-1, La-5 or BF-109f2 must be a charm to fly also.

LoBiSoMeM · #4 10-09-2012, 03:21 PM

I like to fly everything.

Simple.

And CloD one looks better... and runs better...

major_setback · #5 10-09-2012, 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaptainDoggles

None.

Really?

They get the environment, and a lot of other aircraft too for the price.

Compare the FSX environment: FSX su-26 on youtube -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HCdAEX4jSvM

I'm sure there will be a review of the Su-26 before long in the flight sim magazines, and on the general aviation sim sites.

I think it should appeal to a few, at least.

.

ACE-OF-ACES · #6 10-09-2012, 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by major_setback

I wonder how many non-combat simmers the Su-26 will attract.

Three..

No.. wait.. That is how many licks does it take to get to the center of a tootsie pop!

NM!

Chivas · #7 10-09-2012, 04:28 PM

I think its quite possible the new IL-2 series will attract civilian air traffic on the large channel maps etc, after improvements are made to the game engine and features. Especially after the SDK allows the community and commercial third parties to fine tune the maps.

major_setback · #8 10-09-2012, 05:31 PM

They might get a shock playing online.

philip.ed · #9 10-09-2012, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chivas

I think its quite possible the new IL-2 series will attract civilian air traffic on the large channel maps etc, after improvements are made to the game engine and features. Especially after the SDK allows the community and commercial third parties to fine tune the maps.

Sorry, using which civilian transport planes and which effectively working air-to-ground communications systems? And which dynamic weather? You're thinking maybe 10 years into the future. If BoM fails, the game most likely won't be around then, and most likely won't be the best platform for civilian fliers.

CaptainDoggles · #10 10-09-2012, 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by major_setback

Really?

They get the environment, and a lot of other aircraft too for the price.

Compare the FSX environment: FSX su-26 on youtube -

I'm sure there will be a review of the Su-26 before long in the flight sim magazines, and on the general aviation sim sites.

I think it should appeal to a few, at least.

.

Anyone who flies civilian sims likely already has FSX. You think they're going to buy this buggy piece of trash for one single aircraft?