Arguments for and against photo scenery

[Jumo211]

Originally Posted by speculum jockey

Ughhh! Do we have to say this every week?

1. FSX cherry-picks the scenery they show.

So many similar amazing looking videos on youtube it's almost disgusting , what cherry picking ?
some of them are made with even older FS2004
Yes , such scenery packages can cover the whole globe and take 100GB+
of hard disk space but that's not a big deal these days
FSX globe size coverage against CloD Battle of Britain ground coverage .
BoB textures could have been almost gold plated by this time , really .
There is indeed no point at all in comparing commercial airlaners simulator with WWII simulator ,
yes but FSX is not even close looking to what was
originally released by Microsoft and the game is also old by today's standards .
We will have to wait and see how many 3rd parties will jump on CloD and
start pumping out some of the new ground and aircrafts visual amazing stuff
Thus far number of private businesses and companies still working on FSX
is beyond believe .
FSX don't have shitty ground looking textures anymore .

S!

[SsSsSsSsSnake]

lol