Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-06-2012, 03:46 PM
palidian palidian is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 15
Default

There were many design flaws in the ME 262, however jet engines are 90% thermal efficient, they don't get hot like internal combustion engines, that are around 30% efficient.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-06-2012, 04:06 PM
SaQSoN SaQSoN is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Nowhereland
Posts: 340
Default

Oh, boy! Another homegrown expert. He knows it all...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-06-2012, 10:50 PM
IceFire IceFire is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,879
Default

The actual WWII pilots are, of course, completely wrong
__________________
Find my missions and much more at Mission4Today.com
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-07-2012, 06:46 AM
TinyTim TinyTim is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 98
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by palidian View Post
The ME262 over heats at 100%,
Depends on how fast you are flying. Go past 700 kph and you'll never overheat, even at 100%.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-08-2012, 09:39 PM
WTE_Galway WTE_Galway is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,207
Default

Soooo ... shall we start another "0.50 cal is porked" debate now ?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-09-2012, 04:28 AM
jameson jameson is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 222
Default

The 109's are porked. Perhaps you experts could enlighten us, anyone from TD most welcome to add their 2 cents to the discussion. FWIW I think they are 50kph too slow. Don't mention the concrete elevator please or the ai's landing speed which is below stall speed of g6 etc etc.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-09-2012, 04:26 PM
TinyTim TinyTim is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 98
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jameson View Post
The 109's are porked.FWIW I think they are 50kph too slow.
And what precisely makes you think so?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-09-2012, 05:45 PM
jameson jameson is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 222
Default

I was hoping someone could work it out for themselves and enlighten the rest of us! If you're fishing for clues, er, start with engine set to 1.3ata, which according to pilot's manual should produce at least 2500rpm up to maximum of 2600rpm. At this setting, at sea level, a g6 should reach 520kph\530kph. If you can do better in game, at that setting, more than 420kph, do tell us how....
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-09-2012, 06:00 PM
JtD JtD is offline
Il-2 enthusiast & Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 903
Default

Maybe you shouldn't pay too close attention to gauges, they've been wrong since v1.0 (roughly 10 years). In particular at medium power settings. Try flying full power, that's the only point where game should match real life. And it does.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-09-2012, 07:49 PM
jameson jameson is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 222
Default

Well that's the point I'm trying to make, 109's are porked. At full power in game (110%), we only get what in RL a 109g could achieve at 1.3ata. In RL you could still push the throttle out to 1.42ata for brief periods. IIRC at 1.42ata max level speed was about 580kph, the climb rate must have been pretty amazing as well.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.