Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-16-2010, 05:52 PM
76.IAP-Blackbird 76.IAP-Blackbird is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 167
Default

I have to add that I love those small details like the bulletbelt in the Avia or the open window mechanism modeled in the DXX. TEAM DAIDALOS add so much attention to small but very cool details and I think the comunity loves it!! Damn good work keep it coming!

  #12  
Old 01-16-2010, 05:55 PM
MikkOwl MikkOwl is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 309
Default

Keep up the good work.

Questions:

1. Regarding the 3d models and cockpit views: What models are used exactly from the cockpit view?

A seperate for the internals only, and everything not inside is the regular exterior model just seen up close? I have been wondering if there is any way to increase the detail, especially on the textures, of the plane seen from inside the cockpit. The engines in twin engined planes tend to look especially rough, like the Bf 110.

An effort to somehow prioritize exterior details for the areas which are seen from inside the cockpit would raise the graphics more than many other possible updates.

2. What is the word on Twin Throttle support? I don't mind lacking radars, but I do have a G940 and a quadrant, with a huge itch towards flying those twin engined heavy fighters.
  #13  
Old 01-16-2010, 05:56 PM
Viking's Avatar
Viking Viking is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 456
Default Fan-tastic!

Only a little worried about the timeline!

Will SOW not come untill june 2011??

regards

viking

Last edited by Viking; 01-16-2010 at 06:00 PM. Reason: Typo
  #14  
Old 01-16-2010, 05:58 PM
csThor csThor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: somewhere in Germany
Posts: 1,213
Default

Timeline is strictly Team Daidalos. Nothing to do with Maddox Games's plans at all.
  #15  
Old 01-16-2010, 05:58 PM
Flanker35M Flanker35M is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,806
Default ...

S!

Good to see IL-2 is not dead New additions look very nice. Are there any plans on updating the graphics card and sound card support in any way in upcoming patches? Thank you for the continuing support Team Daidalos!
  #16  
Old 01-16-2010, 06:17 PM
Zorin Zorin is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 573
Default

Another question. Will the instruments on the engine nacelles be visible from the cockpit?

http://s205.photobucket.com/albums/b...nstruments.jpg

Loadouts should be:

4x SC50 centerline on single ETC 50s

1x SC250kg (Romanian units)

or

MK 101
MK 103

All with the option for 2x SC50 (one per wing)

http://s205.photobucket.com/albums/b...=hs129rack.jpg

Last edited by Zorin; 01-16-2010 at 06:41 PM.
  #17  
Old 01-16-2010, 07:21 PM
Qpassa's Avatar
Qpassa Qpassa is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Valladolid-Spain-EU
Posts: 700
Default

Thanks for improve IL2
  #18  
Old 01-16-2010, 07:42 PM
Eldur Eldur is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 101
Default

Looks like FMB+... I hope this works then (because the mod doesn't in my case).

Anyway, I want suggest the possibility to save and load object groups. It would be great if we could do so because this makes it possible to re-use certian groups like artillery positions, AAA nests etc in several missions plus we could share them for others. That would make the upgrade perfect.
  #19  
Old 01-16-2010, 09:13 PM
KG26_Alpha KG26_Alpha is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,805
Default

[QUOTE=csThor;136693]Actually, regarding the Hs 129 B-2, a good number of currently available loadouts should be deleted because they aren't historical (that doesn't work, though, due to bad experiences with the IAR 80/81 way back). The BK 3,7 is among them as is the loadout with the 4x 7,92mm MG17 and the SC 250 as no evidence for their use on the front has come to the light so far (and people far more knowledgable on the subject than us looked). In the case of the Bk 3,7 it's interesting to note that tests were aborted very early as the cannon (or rather the gondola installation) had a very ugly effect on plane performance so the Hs 129 kept using Mk 101 and Mk 103 (from early 1943 on) autocannons for tank busting.[/QUOTE


What about the B3, is that not going to be flyable then ?
  #20  
Old 01-16-2010, 09:29 PM
rakinroll rakinroll is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Türkiye
Posts: 527
Default

Thank you DT, Horrido!
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.