Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 06-11-2010, 03:28 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

This is looking awesome, we can see this coming to life now

Those clouds aren't half bad too. If they are defined a bit more, solidified a bit, and included with flat-bottom this will knock anything in any sim for six!

Oleg, check this out:

here's the link:
  #22  
Old 06-11-2010, 03:29 PM
proton45's Avatar
proton45 proton45 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 651
Default

The (auto) weathering/paint on the Spitfires look great !!!!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ren-and-stimpy-happy-joy.jpg (28.6 KB, 30 views)
  #23  
Old 06-11-2010, 04:33 PM
gm1 gm1 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 4
Default

Fantastic shots. Even more excited about now. Great work!
  #24  
Old 06-11-2010, 04:37 PM
ElAurens's Avatar
ElAurens ElAurens is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Black Swamp of Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

I so want to fly the Walrus.

I love flying boats.
__________________


Personally speaking, the P-40 could contend on an equal footing with all the types of Messerschmitts, almost to the end of 1943.
~Nikolay Gerasimovitch Golodnikov
  #25  
Old 06-11-2010, 04:53 PM
Qpassa's Avatar
Qpassa Qpassa is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Valladolid-Spain-EU
Posts: 700
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philip.ed View Post
This is looking awesome, we can see this coming to life now

Those clouds aren't half bad too. If they are defined a bit more, solidified a bit, and included with flat-bottom this will knock anything in any sim for six!

Oleg, check this out:

here's the link:
fantastic video
__________________
Expecting:
Call of Duty

Youtube Profile: http://www.youtube.com/user/E69Qpassa
  #26  
Old 06-11-2010, 05:07 PM
swiss swiss is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Zürich, Swiss Confederation
Posts: 2,266
Default

To be honest:; Those pics look like IL2.
(maybe slightly pimped, IL, bust still...)
All the pics we have been shown had way higher details.

What happened?
  #27  
Old 06-11-2010, 05:47 PM
philip.ed's Avatar
philip.ed philip.ed is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,766
Default

Oleg has said these pictures are slightly older.
  #28  
Old 06-11-2010, 06:59 PM
Friendly_flyer's Avatar
Friendly_flyer Friendly_flyer is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 412
Default

I love the weathering on the Spitfire! How many missions must you survive to get it that worn? How worn can a plane get if you treat her well?

It was great to see the Walrus! Is there a hope that she will, at some point in the future, be made flyable?

The markings on the Spitfire is a bit off though. Squadron codes on RAF planes was usually sky (the same light green-blue-gray colour they used on the underside), or sometimes medium sea gray (a somewhat darker, less saturated hue). The serial numbers were always in black, and in 1940 always a single letter followed by four numbers, with no spacing or hyphen.
__________________
Fly friendly!



Visit No 79 Squadron vRAF

Petter Bøckman
Norway
  #29  
Old 06-11-2010, 07:10 PM
Ernst Ernst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swiss View Post
To be honest:; Those pics look like IL2.
(maybe slightly pimped, IL, bust still...)
All the pics we have been shown had way higher details.

What happened?
My concerns are more about new FMs, aircraft management and historical aspects than graphics. I already stated here that actual graphics Oleg showed us are beyond my expectatives about graphics. 3rd party can develop more beautifull graphics, i think Oleg and his teams are more worried in engine development than nice graphics. What i expect from SoW is new and more powerfull engine. Whats the advantage of nice graphics but porked fms and engine like FSX.

If you complain so much Oleg ll give you nice graphics but bad engine, fms. If there is lack of time to develop nice graphics and the engine, fms i would prefer engine and fms.

Oleg can you bring updates about other features in SoW, like management of aircrafts, fms etc?

Last edited by Ernst; 06-11-2010 at 07:17 PM.
  #30  
Old 06-11-2010, 07:28 PM
David603 David603 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: 6'clock high
Posts: 713
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by F19_lacrits View Post
Very nice screen shots! The last few weeks are showing nice progress
The Macchi 200 is very nice.. or is it a G.50?.. love the clouds and depth in the view

There seems to be a hole in the stabilizer of the spits? Is this just a rendering issue or skins issue.. easily fixed I'm sure.. it is visible also on the far spit..
I don't think that's a hole, it looks like the mechanism for the elevator trim tabs.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.