Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 04-24-2012, 01:39 PM
ATAG_Dutch ATAG_Dutch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,793
Default

These graphs only show performance from 2000/3000m and up, whereas the previous graphs showed performance from 0m and up.

It's very interesting to note that between 3000 and 5000m, the patched 109E4 performs better than RL, whereas both the Rotol Hurri and the MkIa Spitfire perform worse than RL at these altitudes.

Please can we see graphs for the Spits and Hurris from 0m and up, so we can make a true comparison?

Many Thanks.

Last edited by ATAG_Dutch; 04-24-2012 at 01:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-24-2012, 01:39 PM
BlackSix BlackSix is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Moscow, Russian Federation
Posts: 533
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
You dont have any other information, but work continues to have the patch this week? Yes?
Yes
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-24-2012, 01:45 PM
SiThSpAwN's Avatar
SiThSpAwN SiThSpAwN is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC Canada
Posts: 665
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSix View Post
Yes

Thank You Blacksix... oh and by the way, I felt the same as you about Diablo III
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-24-2012, 01:46 PM
BlackSix BlackSix is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Moscow, Russian Federation
Posts: 533
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATAG_Dutch View Post
These graphs only show performance from 3000m and up, whereas the previous graphs showed performance from 0m and up.

It's very interesting to note that between 3000 and 5000m, the patched 109E4 performs better than RL, whereas both the Rotol Hurri and the MkIa Spitfire perform worse than RL at these altitudes.

Please can we see graphs for the Spits and Hurris from 0m and up, so we can make a true comparison?

Many Thanks.
We don't have official flight tests for Spits and Hurris between 0 and 3000m.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-24-2012, 01:49 PM
BlackSix BlackSix is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Moscow, Russian Federation
Posts: 533
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Thank You Blacksix... oh and by the way, I felt the same as you about Diablo III
OMG! Everything is monitored and translated?))
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-24-2012, 01:51 PM
SiThSpAwN's Avatar
SiThSpAwN SiThSpAwN is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC Canada
Posts: 665
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSix View Post
OMG! Everything is monitored and translated?))

Yes... well all those cold war spies need to do something now
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-24-2012, 01:58 PM
EAF51/155_TonyR's Avatar
EAF51/155_TonyR EAF51/155_TonyR is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Salerno, Italy
Posts: 48
Default

Im flying the Spit 1a very often in this period and, if i well understand the graph, i never was able to reach 310 mph=500 kmh in level flight. At most i can reach 260 mph. Probably im making something wrong.
__________________


Windows 7 ultimate 64 - i7 2600k - Asus P8P67 - 2 x Radeon HD 6970 2 Gb - 12 Gb Ram Corsair - SSD OCZ Vertex 2e 120 Gb - HD WD Caviar Black 1 Tb - Coolermaster Silent Pro Gold 1000 W - res 1360x768 - Logitec G940 Hotas - Saitek Combat rudder pedals - Trackir 5
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-24-2012, 02:01 PM
ATAG_Snapper's Avatar
ATAG_Snapper ATAG_Snapper is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSix View Post
We don't have official flight tests for Spits and Hurris between 0 and 3000m.
Thanks, Black Six. At last we finally know why the Spitfire Ia's top speed at sea level is 240 mph. The slope of the curve was simply applied to the 0 - 3000 m gap in information, so 0 feet = 240 mph. Mystery solved.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-24-2012, 02:03 PM
41Sqn_Banks 41Sqn_Banks is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 644
Default



I've read the values from the various charts by a ruler. Note that I only used the values at altitude 0, 1000, 2000, ..., 10000 (1000 m step)
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-24-2012, 02:05 PM
41Sqn_Banks 41Sqn_Banks is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATAG_Snapper View Post
Thanks, Black Six. At last we finally know why the Spitfire Ia's top speed at sea level is 240 mph. The slope of the curve was simply applied to the 0 - 3000 m gap in information, so 0 feet = 240 mph. Mystery solved.
This chart gives speed down to 0 feet. I think it's calculated as the test log only goes down to 3000 m.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.