|
FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Flight Model (FM) Testing Hurricane Mk.I v1.10.20332 Beta
Flight Model (FM) Testing Hurricane Mk.I v1.10.20332 Beta
CONFIGURATION: The following Top Speed per Altitude (TSPA) test was performed starting with a full fuel load and ammo load (no bombs) and the radiators/cowlings are set to full open (worst case). PROCEDURE: The top speed is tested at each of the following altitudes: Code:
100ft 1,000ft 2,000ft 4,000ft 6,000ft 8,000ft 10,000ft 12,000ft 14,000ft 16,000ft 17,750ft (Spit MAX) 20,000ft 22,000ft 24,000ft 26,000ft 28,000ft 30,000ft During the flight all pertinent data is logged using a C# script. The TAS and altitude (Z_VelocityTAS & Z_AltitudeMSL) data is than graphed (see attached). The graph only plots the max TAS value per altitude. If you would like to viewed/inspected all the TAS values you can do so at my web site http://www.flightsimtesting.com/. NOTE at my site you can compare one in-game plan to in-game plane, or an in-game plane to one of the many real world data sets that are uploaded at my web site. This was done to make it easier to see how well the in-game plane test data matches the real world test data. You can also change the units SI to imperial, and save any graph displayed by simply right-mouse-clicking on the graph and saving it as an image to your PC. I am also in the process of allowing you to upload your own in-game and/or real world test data at my web site, after which you will be able to graph and compare data via my web site. SPECIAL THANKS TO: FST for double checking my C# script file FG28_Kodiak for all his help with C# scripts Ataros for all his help with C# scripts
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Nice, thanks. Confirmed what I believed that the spits out climbing us at low level.
Any reason you used the 109 E4B and not a regular 109 like the 109 E4? Last edited by 5./JG27.Farber; 10-14-2012 at 09:39 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Not sure how you came to that conclusion based on a top speed per altitude test? You should wait for my ROC testing to make such calls. On that note, if your looking at the ROC data from this TSPA test at my website, DONT! In that the ROC data collected during this TSPA test consists of a ZOOM climb between altitudes, thus not a valid ROC test! None
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Ahhh I wondered why the graph was having a fit...
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Roger.. near the top of the website on the 'IL-2 Cliffs of Dover' you should see a pull down menu called 'Test Type'.. The default is 'Rate of Climb (ROC)', switch it to 'Top Speed per Altitude (TSPA)'. That will switch the graph below from displaying ROC data to TAS data from the CoD C# log files. Also note, you can switch the units the graphs displays.
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks keep it up!
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Many thanks!!! Nice work...
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
so hurricane is much too fast at high altitude.
It climbs faster than the spit currently. |
|
|