#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
As I said, steel AP was NOT in use during WW2, at least not in serious use. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
please sources for that claim. Actualy most usual AP penetrators have been steel or aloys containing steel. For the Russians and US anyway. The quality of the shell was or is still dependant on the used material and alloy. And particularly the Soviets and US did tried not to use to many different materials to make sure the shells could be produced in large numbers so it was always available. So I say it again HEAT shells have been RARE while usual KE (kynetic energy) penetrators have been the NORM. APCB, APCBC and APCR and APDS have been known and (more or less) the common shells. For which the later APCR and APDS have been pretty rare. Only some British guns had APDS shells (from what I know), the Russians most of the time used usual AP or APC (SU100, Su85 etc.) while the Germans had the APCBC as standart and APCR in small numbers available.
~ when I am talking about "steel" I am talking about the alloys which was used for the shells. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
hmm didn't know that. I thought pretty much all of them had explosives inside...
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
well what was used many times as well was the APHE shell ~ but it was not orking on the principle of shaped charges or in other words HEAT they came later. At least in the begining when the velocity of anti tank guns was not that high. Expecialy the Germans made here quite good shells. It was basicaly a armor pearcing shell filed with explosives designed in a way that it should penetrate the enemy armor and explode inside not sure if they had a fuse for that but I think it started with originaly with naval guns as they needed both penetration and explosives to get a ship penetrating it alone would not always sink it. Precise methods of differentially hardening the projectile were developed in particular by the Germans for example so it could deal better with the shock of the penetration achieving much more success with their shells that way so premature explosions on impact have been less. Later they had to move toward shells with a hard core cause of increasing armor on the enemy side which required guns with high velocity and thus different materials and shapes of shells as the APHE shells did not worked so effectively with high velocity anti tank guns. So for example the APCR is a shell with some aloy on the outside and a very dense material as core or "second shell" inside increasing the penetration quality a lot (tungsten usualy) I think 3 times the size of the caliber even on long ranges compared to the usualy 2 or 1.5 times with APCBC
I wish I could get the books about it as there are many details behind it. And I am not a pro when it comes to that. So some details by me might be eventualy misleading. Last edited by Crni vuk; 06-16-2010 at 10:22 PM. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
heh, I checked and it turned out pretty much all AP shells had explosives inside, though often a very small amount (that's why AP rounds were called shells I guess). Problem was making efficient fuses for these explosives.
Without explosives the shells would do much less damage. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe. Won't know unless you try it.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
So, nobody made a mod yet to fix the retarded penetration values for many guns in this game? I'm tired how may Pz II's I've lost to .50 cal penetrations from the front (if you wan't a laser guided weapon in this, game get the quad .50 cal AA: instantly kills infantry, and disable any tank from the side by destroying the tracks.) I'm also tired of losing Pz IV's to the 2pdr gun from the front.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
The 2pounder, were able to punch thru 56 or 57mm of armor and since the Pz4E and G only have 50mm of frontal armor, well you get the picture.
~Zeke. |
|
|