Friday 2010-12-10 Dev. video update and Discussion

Originally Posted by Baron

Was kind of the point of this update, oleg asked a question, a majority of posters awnsered another q (that was never asked btw) instead and we havent seen him since.(exept for a few posts by oleg in the beginning)

....so? I don't understand what's the problem with it... does he HAVE to? C'mon guys, if you haven't understood how the guy works by now I reckon u r hopeless in judging characters

...and please, I just used a thing called sarcasm, don't take it personally...

[Baron]

Originally Posted by Sternjaeger

....so? I don't understand what's the problem with it... does he HAVE to? C'mon guys, if you haven't understood how the guy works by now I reckon u r hopeless in judging characters

...and please, I just used a thing called sarcasm, don't take it personally...

No, he absolutly does not. Thinks some mean the threadh have surved its purpose (or not) thats all.

[Necrobaron]

Originally Posted by Insuber

Necrobaron,

It was a bit of humour among pages and pages of scientifical dissertations. Maybe in your culture humour works differently, apologies in that case. BTW your sentence "Oleg specifically asked for input and he got it" is a great piece of humour to my eyes, bravo!

Insuber

No apologies needed! I sometimes think humor/sarcasm is hard to detect on a message forum.

[ElAurens]

Truth!

[nearmiss]

It always amazes me

How much verbiage posters can create about practically nothing.

Flame colors from exhausts... Oleg got enough from the first day of postings I'd say.

Sometimes I think Oleg is just making a joke and members don't get it.

[SlipBall]

Originally Posted by nearmiss

It always amazes me

How much verbiage posters can create about practically nothing.

Flame colors from exhausts... Oleg got enough from the first day of postings I'd say.

Sometimes I think Oleg is just making a joke and members don't get it.

Well he like's to keep us busy

[JAMF]

Originally Posted by SlipBall

Well he like's to keep us busy

Or it could be easier to ask people to give the proof of how it was and do the research in advance for you, than change it all again afterwards.

[julian265]

Originally Posted by nearmiss

Sometimes I think Oleg is just making a joke and members don't get it.

Like a thread for "FAQ-QUESTIONS,release date,system specs, for SOW" ?

Also, sarcasm doesn't show through text well... Unless it's really obvious or the reader knows the poster well.

IMO ...
"Effect of exhaust flame at night time. Emulation of each cylinder exhaust in relation to emulation of real engine cylinders work by a program.
My question to community: isn't it too yellow? Maybe to add a bit red color in a mix with yellow? It is tunable really, so I would like to listen suggestions"
... is not a joke. Suggestions were asked for and provided, in this case the desire for an official response is far more justified than to a query buried in any usual thread full of speculation.

[ElAurens]

And now the thread will proceed another 10 plus pages with us arguing weather or not all the info provided was really necessary, and what Oleg wanted.

LOL!!!!

You guys really need to relax.

[WTE_Galway]

Originally Posted by Dutch_851

Precisely. Discussion was invited regarding flame colour being too yellow in the shot. Everyone says 'should be blue'. We don't as yet appear to have a response to this.

lots of response

the consensus was:

- yellow when its a stack fire from over priming (priming pumps raw fuel into the inlets) and

- blue in a running engine though you wouldn't normally see the blue in daylight


though there was some confusion between overpriming flames and a running engine followed by a lot of interesting but off topic stuff about fuel mixtures