|
IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
||||
|
||||
It's the lack of info that makes me a bit twitchy... Oleg answering q's on this forum was a relief, but in the absence of a firmish date, a trickle of information or shots would be helpful.
BoB hasn't been too bad when compared to the rrgstudio effort. For all we know, everyone there could have died in a workplace accident. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#43
|
||||
|
||||
nope, you'd be wondering if IL-2 was considered dead by the developers, why they're being so quiet, and why the patch isn't out yet.
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I mean really, people know that devs have other stuff going on. And in the mean time, there are other things to do - like play IL2, throw charts at each other in forum flame wars, play other games, date, work, house and vehicle maintenance... y'know, life goes on. Then one day.... "WOAH, new 5#1T!!!! I gotta get this!" |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
-Raven |
#46
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
EDIT: In fact november 2006 is the only release date ever published (in may 2006): "Today Ubisoft, one of the world’s largest video game publishers, announces Storm of War: Battle of Britain, to come in November 2006 for PCs worldwide. Storm of War: Battle of Britain is the first instalment in the new Storm of War franchise from award-winning developer Maddox Games. Ubisoft and Maddox games previously collaborated on the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik and Pacific Fighters games." /Mazex |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Two Years
be sure |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Ok, so we don't know when SoW will be released. It's easier to accept that now it is being discussed. I think who were annoyed by the statements of some have probably got it out of their system now.
But please, Evgeny, would you consider moderating the title of this thread - as all it is going to do is perpetuate future arguments over what some people believe to be a release date, and the resulting superflous arguments that result. I don't think you need that in this forum either, could I be right here? |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
sure no
|
|
|