Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #921  
Old 09-28-2012, 07:05 AM
Lagarto Lagarto is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 236
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ala13_Kokakolo View Post

8. Hidraulic presure damage modeled? (gear drop when hit at certain spot)
+1!
Reply With Quote
  #922  
Old 09-28-2012, 05:05 PM
Orangeman Orangeman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 17
Default Ki-44

Quote:
Originally Posted by magot View Post
Creator of Ki-44 cooperate with DT on this model. But it´s not planned for 4.12.
(Only external model)
Does that mean it will be AI only when introduced? What about for 4.13?
Reply With Quote
  #923  
Old 09-29-2012, 01:24 AM
RegRag1977 RegRag1977 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 139
Question Bf109 G4 why not?

Would be good to have an alternative to the Bf109G2, why not give us a G4? It would give something less dominant between 42 and 43...
Reply With Quote
  #924  
Old 09-29-2012, 01:32 AM
spiteful21k spiteful21k is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4
Default Ships

What I have never quite understood is why there is no AAA defence on the freighters. Maybe a standard 20mm on the bow and stern as this was a fairly standard calibre for all beligerents.
Reply With Quote
  #925  
Old 09-29-2012, 01:36 AM
Fighterace Fighterace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 269
Default

Does the B-29 3Dmodel need any rework? THe grey disc of the prop spinning looks over-done?
Reply With Quote
  #926  
Old 09-29-2012, 02:01 AM
~BeoWolf~ ~BeoWolf~ is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hanford, CA.
Posts: 24
Default

Just saw the latest update, love you can pick skins for static aircraft. Lots of good stuff for FMB............. BUT.......... and it's big BUT, I'd still like to see a gui button for formation style. Don't see why it would be hard to do, you can pick the formation you are leading in game with Tab/comms. I'd like to be able to set all of the flights I make into the correct formation type for the mission. Instead of SBD's forming in Finger four to the left for all flights I'd like to make them form up in eschelon left and right, attack planes usually flew in eschelond. I'd like to make Vic flights for BoB missions, etc....etc...etc....

a gui switch in FMB to do this would be a very powerful mission building tool

Been asking and hoping now for years that this would finally get done before IL-2 is given up on and no longer modded.

So if you guys can swing it I'm sure it would be a very appreciated option for mission builders.

Thanks

Hoss
Reply With Quote
  #927  
Old 09-29-2012, 03:05 PM
Fighterace Fighterace is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 269
Default

Some Ju-88 Heavy fighters, Ground attack &/or Night fighters
Reply With Quote
  #928  
Old 09-29-2012, 07:04 PM
Wolkenbeisser Wolkenbeisser is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 37
Default

Request: A selectable "blank" in the fields "Staffel" and "Nummer" in the loadout-screen of dogfight missions.
Why: Because I want to be able to find the carrier with my own skin.

What I mean?
On a dogfight map, where your homebase has a country (any country except "none") you are forced to select a "Staffel number" and a plane "number". But if you want to fly with a skin, that already has a number on it, your plane shows two numbers in game (= ugly). Well, as a mission-builder you can tell me "just select 'none' in the coutry-field, when you set the homebase on the map". But that's no option. If you want to receive the signal from the directional beacon of an US-carrier, you have to fly as an US-country (USAAF, USN, USMC). Just a red homebase with country "none" does not work.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #929  
Old 09-29-2012, 07:08 PM
Wolkenbeisser Wolkenbeisser is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 37
Default

Engine startup of P-51B and C (and RAF-Mustang) shows smoke only on one side of the enginge. Would be nice to see this corrected.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #930  
Old 09-30-2012, 02:35 PM
stugumby stugumby is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 383
Default

Just curious but shouldnt the fokker dxx series planes have some type of adjustable prop pitch and radiator control/cowl flap etc? Seems wierd a 3 bladed metal prop and no pitch adjustments, maybe its coded like the sm-79 a 2 speed?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.