Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 09-17-2012, 06:14 PM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
I reckon Crumpp is not aware of the fact that by coarseing the pitch in the 109 the rpm drops accordingly.
Not if you are using it right.

Rpm will drop as the speed increases and the propeller begins to drive the engine. Coarsen pitch as the rpm begins to drop to maintain it.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 09-17-2012, 06:21 PM
kohmelo kohmelo is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp
Is that hard to understand or something? It must be as we have multiple pages on this simple concept.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robo. View Post
...I reckon Crumpp is not aware of the fact that by coarseing the pitch in the 109 the rpm drops accordingly.
Crumpp wake up!
I really start to believe we are losing something in translations or then I am only one. (Honestly I needed to take dictionary on my hand)

You must maintain that rpm setting at a constant rate.
- You must pursue that (efficient) rpm setting at a continuous rate (by manual pitch)

Its like Bouy rocking after a wave.
Wave hits Buoy -> it must maintain its stability at a constant rate

I really believe that most of us are speaking of the same thing but everybody have their eyes fixed on one single point of this issue
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 09-17-2012, 09:04 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kohmelo View Post
I really start to believe we are losing something in translations or then I am only one.
Not really, Only thing that makes it hard to read is Crumpp's atempt at trying to redefine the word 'maintain'.. Clinton would be proud!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 09-17-2012, 09:07 PM
NZtyphoon NZtyphoon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NZ
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
At high altitudes, the airplane is essentially in slow flight for most of the envelope. That makes cooling harder and overboost conditions will heat the motor up faster.

If they wanted to use a limited overboost condition, they would be constantly changing rpm between maximum continious and higher limited overboost to cool the motor.
Interesting how this only now becomes a measure to cool the hydraulic supercharger, according to our resident aviation expert; still it is correct that the hydraulic coupling of the DB supercharger led to problems with overheating that the pilots needed to control by constantly altering rpm - not maintaining it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
A complete sidetrack as to how they are using the propeller and rpm to gain speed.
Wrong; the pilots were needing to adjust rpm and pitch constantly to periodically rest the supercharger - any gain in speed was a by-product, not a tactic.
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 09-17-2012, 09:15 PM
macro macro is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 217
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
Not if you are using it right.

Rpm will drop as the speed increases and the propeller begins to drive the engine. Coarsen pitch as the rpm begins to drop to maintain it.
eh?

rpm will increase as speed increases not drop, until you adjust pitch, at least my 109 does anyway lol
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 09-17-2012, 09:30 PM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
rpm will increase as speed increases not drop, until you adjust pitch, at least my 109 does anyway lol
OOPs, yes it should increase and you coarsen the pitch to keep rpm constant.



Quote:
You must maintain that rpm setting at a constant rate.
- You must pursue that (efficient) rpm setting at a continuous rate (by manual pitch)
Correct.

They are changing rpm to an overboost condition, adjusting pitch to maintain the overboost rpm setting, and then reducing it let things cool down.

When they reduce rpm, they also adjust the pitch to maintain the new rpm setting as the aircrafts speed changes.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 09-17-2012, 09:35 PM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
NZtyphoon


Maybe it is time for your stability and control documents.

You know, the ones with the picture of the Spitfire and the general comments that have nothing to do with the Spitfire?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 09-17-2012, 10:51 PM
NZtyphoon NZtyphoon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NZ
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
Not really, Only thing that makes it hard to read is Crumpp's atempt at trying to redefine the word 'maintain'.. Clinton would be proud!
Perhaps this might help



is different to



but, rather than keeping things



Crumpp likes to change context and words to maintain whatever argument he thinks he has.
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 09-17-2012, 11:53 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NZtyphoon View Post
Crumpp likes to change context and words to maintain whatever argument he thinks he has.
Bingo!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 09-18-2012, 07:09 AM
Kurfürst Kurfürst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NZtyphoon View Post
still it is correct that the hydraulic coupling of the DB supercharger led to problems with overheating that the pilots needed to control by constantly altering rpm - not maintaining it.
Nope, it's incorrect. Hydraulic couplings generate more heat to the oil during slip (friction generating heat), but it doesn't mean the oil was overheating, because

a) the fact that increased oil cooling requirements could be and were compensated by increasing oil cooling capacity (note the rather sizeable oil radiator on the 109)

b) the fact that at and above FTH the hydraulic coupling has minimum slip (in the order of about 3%) and therefore, the heat load is only marginally different from a fixed ratio mechanically geared supercharger. If there's no extra friction, there is no extra heat, simple as that.

This is evident from DB heat charts, i.e. the DB 605A lubricant heat transfer was 65 000 kcal/hour at sea level, when the hyd. supercharger was operating at maximum slip, but only 43 000 kcal, or roughly 2/3s at FTH, where the hyd. supercharger was operating at minimum slip.

Quote:
Wrong; the pilots were needing to adjust rpm and pitch constantly to periodically rest the supercharger - any gain in speed was a by-product, not a tactic.
Bull on all accounts.. the supercharger itself does not "overheat", its just a piece of magnesium alloy and does not operate at extreme temperatures, neither does it have any sort of forced cooling.

Secondly, increasing revs by about 200 rpm _was_ a sanctioned tactic that increased the supercharger capacity and altitude output of the engine, as noted in the November 1940 LWHQ notice that has been already posted, and led to some noteworthy speed increase above rated altitude, as noted by the 109F manual. And if the speed increases, the pitch angle does need to be changed of course, just as at any rpm and at any altitude, when the speed increases.

All they did was manipulating the pitch to let rpm increase, and then - by when the rpm has increased - manipulating pitch to compensate for increase airspeed AND maintain increased rpm.
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200
Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415

Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org

Last edited by Kurfürst; 09-18-2012 at 07:53 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.