![]() |
#81
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Rpm will drop as the speed increases and the propeller begins to drive the engine. Coarsen pitch as the rpm begins to drop to maintain it.
__________________
|
#82
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
You must maintain that rpm setting at a constant rate. - You must pursue that (efficient) rpm setting at a continuous rate (by manual pitch) Its like Bouy rocking after a wave. Wave hits Buoy -> it must maintain its stability at a constant rate I really believe that most of us are speaking of the same thing but everybody have their eyes fixed on one single point of this issue |
#83
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Wrong; the pilots were needing to adjust rpm and pitch constantly to periodically rest the supercharger - any gain in speed was a by-product, not a tactic. |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
rpm will increase as speed increases not drop, until you adjust pitch, at least my 109 does anyway lol |
#86
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
They are changing rpm to an overboost condition, adjusting pitch to maintain the overboost rpm setting, and then reducing it let things cool down. When they reduce rpm, they also adjust the pitch to maintain the new rpm setting as the aircrafts speed changes.
__________________
|
#87
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() Maybe it is time for your stability and control documents. You know, the ones with the picture of the Spitfire and the general comments that have nothing to do with the Spitfire?
__________________
|
#88
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() is different to ![]() but, rather than keeping things ![]() Crumpp likes to change context and words to maintain whatever argument he thinks he has. |
#89
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
a) the fact that increased oil cooling requirements could be and were compensated by increasing oil cooling capacity (note the rather sizeable oil radiator on the 109) b) the fact that at and above FTH the hydraulic coupling has minimum slip (in the order of about 3%) and therefore, the heat load is only marginally different from a fixed ratio mechanically geared supercharger. If there's no extra friction, there is no extra heat, simple as that. This is evident from DB heat charts, i.e. the DB 605A lubricant heat transfer was 65 000 kcal/hour at sea level, when the hyd. supercharger was operating at maximum slip, but only 43 000 kcal, or roughly 2/3s at FTH, where the hyd. supercharger was operating at minimum slip. Quote:
Secondly, increasing revs by about 200 rpm _was_ a sanctioned tactic that increased the supercharger capacity and altitude output of the engine, as noted in the November 1940 LWHQ notice that has been already posted, and led to some noteworthy speed increase above rated altitude, as noted by the 109F manual. And if the speed increases, the pitch angle does need to be changed of course, just as at any rpm and at any altitude, when the speed increases. All they did was manipulating the pitch to let rpm increase, and then - by when the rpm has increased - manipulating pitch to compensate for increase airspeed AND maintain increased rpm.
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200 Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415 Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org ![]() Last edited by Kurfürst; 09-18-2012 at 07:53 AM. |
![]() |
|
|