![]() |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Heh, if it were only that simple. Though it may be a factor, I hardly believe its a matter of ammo loadouts. If this were the case, there'd be a slew of this sort of pilot in question.
|
#72
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Cool, thanks for editorializing it as a magic bullet. ![]() |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#74
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
1)Prove that they're ONLY hitting the pilot from 200m+ 2)Stop talking If you can't prove it, you're just another noob getting his wings clipped online, crying about cheats rather than learning to fly. So, once again, prove it or shut up. Have you considered the possiblity that these guys are just really good, and you're just really bad? |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#76
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
You obviously didn't bother reading my entire set of posts, or perhaps you decided to ignore the content. 1. I have quoted a British test which used captured German ammunition loadouts, and which shows 1% penetration of pilot armour, and makes no mention of special tungsten rounds. 2. I have linked to Anthony Williams article on the Battle of Britain, which deals with the ammunition used by either side, and which makes no mention of Tungsten cored rounds. 3. I quoted from the Wiki article, which notes only at some point tungsten rounds were built, but also they were not common, and doesn't give a time frame. 4. I have pointed out the Germans implemented as quickly as possible, a policy of converting from 7.92 mm wing weapons to the 20 mm FF, why would this policy be in place if the 7.92mm was as effective as it seems to be in the game? I think it is up to you actually to prove these rounds were in general use during the BoB, available in large quantities, and had the penetrative abilities which seem to be in effect in the game. To suggest that a round which has the same propellant charge would have suddenly the capability to automatically penetrate the same armour which only 99% of the standard German AP rounds, with the same propellant could not, could seems to me to call for proof. Right now you are arguing for their inclusion when it's clear their effectiveness runs contrary to all the available facts. All you have done in your reply is to show you have nothing in way of substantive proof to argue for their inclusion in the game. Last edited by *Buzzsaw*; 10-23-2012 at 12:32 AM. |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
(In no way am I supporting Doggles narrow-minded, tl;dr-esque comment or taking his side, btw.) |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Salute
Here is a quote from an online source re. 7.92mm projectiles used by the Germans and the quantity manufactured: Quote:
|
#79
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I suggest a new thread is opened to discuss ammo load outs and ballistics for this one to stay in topic.
|
#80
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It is possible depends on the pilot/loadout/patience
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|