![]() |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Stocks were ample (given total usage for the battle of 55,000 tons). so I think it's pretty safe to assume 100 octane to be in use by most if not all RAF frontline fighter sqns by June '40 |
#72
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Haha, don't forget winny, this isn't about what's logical, this is about satisfying Lufwhiners...totally different matter.
![]() |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
50,000 tons of 100 octane used is the equivalent of 185,750 hurricane sorties in which all fuel was used. I think there is no doubt from the above figure that 100 was available and more importantly was actually consumed by the fighters of RAF. If you don't agree then how do you account for the consumption. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#75
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
@DC338: That's enough for four full fuel tanks a day for 60 12-aircraft squadrons over 60 days. And as we know, Fighter Command didn't usually send up aircraft in squadron strength.
Not true winny, they were on 100 octane because it was green, and people didn't understand what "being green" meant back then. ![]() Last edited by TheGrunch; 04-03-2011 at 10:25 PM. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
This roughly translates to 25-30 tons of avgas, for a single fighter Squadron, for a week, or about 100-120 tons per month if the first week of August was typical. How many Fighter Squadrons were there, 60 or so..? Works out at roughly 6-7000 tons per month for the entire comand. And at this point not a single operational sortie was flown yet.. It does not take into account bombers that consumed many times that of a fighter on a single sortie, or non operational flight. Its a good educated guess that a single bomber Squadron would consume about 5 times as much avgas than a fighter Squadron - and we know some Blenheim Squadrons were involved. How much fuel that would be, say 500 tons of avgas per month per Bomber Squadron? With just two Blenheim Squadrons we are at 1000 tons for non-operational flights. So we are 7-8000 tons with the two Blenheim Squadrons a month. It does not account for requirements for engine manufacturers to test run engines etc. IIRC in 1944 the British aviation industry required some 2000 tons of 150 grade avgas per month for testing, run-in purposes. Engines have to run-in, and so do newly produced aircraft.. let's assume they needed the same amount in 1940m too. Engines have to be run in before they are safe for full power - the Germans iirc prescribed 15 hours for DB 605AM running time before full ratings could be used and there wouldn't be too much wear or risk of failure. Lets assume 15 hours for the RAF in 1940, which received about 500 new fighters a month, and probably twice the number of engines, at low-power consumption of 25 gallons/hour. That's 15x1000x25=ca. 1700 tons per month.. pretty close. Hmm. We have 10 000 tons of 100 octane per month, assuming 60 Fighter Squadrons and 2 Blenheim Squadrons are using 100 octane and flying regular non-operational missions, and that the manufacturers also run-in their engines and planes properly instead of placing a 'Hope you get lucky' sticker on them upon delivery. But at this point, not a single flight was made against the Luftwaffe using 100 octane fuel. Trouble is, according to the consumption figures, for example in August 1940 an avarage of 10 000 tons of 100 octane was consumed for all the above purposes AND operational flights. There's simply not enough high octane fuel for all that for all Squadrons, hence why about 2/3s-3/4 of the consumption is 87 octane. Of course the figures above are just a rough guess, but then again simply dividing fuel/hurri tank capacity is even rougher..
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200 Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415 Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org ![]() Last edited by Kurfürst; 04-03-2011 at 10:44 PM. |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This isn't a rough guess.
Wood and Dempster wrote in their book "The Narrow Margin": As it turned out, aviation spirit was to prove no worry for the R.A.F. By July 11th, 1940, the day after the Battle of Britain opened, stocks of 100 octane petrol used in the Merlin engine stood at 343,000 tons. On October 10th, twenty-one days before the battle closed, and after 22,000 tons had been issued, stocks had risen to 424,000 tons. With other grades of aviation spirit total stock available on October 10th, 1940, was 666,000 tons. Oil reserves were 34,000 tons |
#78
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sounds like that's an extreme case to me Kurf. I've looked at a few of them, but so far:
![]() Last edited by TheGrunch; 04-04-2011 at 01:15 AM. |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why would they use 100 octane fuel to run in a engine? If it was as scarce as you would have us believe surely they would have used 87oct for non operational purposes.
|
#80
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
because there was a conversion process that wasn't exactly trivial. further engine testing would be done at the levels the engine was expected to run at. you wouldn't test an engien you planned to run on 100 octance with 87 octance.
etc. |
![]() |
|
|