#61
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Actually you have said exactly what i think. ROF planes are hard to fly. No trim controls and lift changes with speed enormously. Rotary engines make aiming even more difficult. Limited visibility upwards doesn't make turn fights easier either. Vertical maneuvers are hard to conduct. The planes bleed speed fast and stall or disintegrate in deep dives. I tend to fly as an energy fighter and use altitude as defense. And it works well on the Syndicate server and different aircraft behave as i would expect based on their performance graphs and description of their strength. But it doesn't work on the Flying Circus server. OK maybe i need to get more experience. I'm not giving up. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
oh yea here's a screen of the game before they post-process and photoshop it all up
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
On top of all this, the server settings can make the difference between a nice air combat environment and the usual airquake. With icons on and head shake off in the server settings, it's easy for some to hit planes from impossible angles. I hope this helps you a bit.
__________________
---------------------------------------- Asus Sabertooth Z77 i7 3770k@4.3GHz+ Noctua NH D14 cooler EVGA GTX 780 Superclocked+ACX cooler. 8GB G.Skill ripjaws DDR3-1600 Crucial M4 128GB SSD+Crucial M4 256GB SSD Seagate 750GB HDD CH Fighterstick+CH Pro pedals+Saitek X45 Win7 64bit |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
At least AA is working great in ROF...and so is everything else |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
I love RoF aswell! It got beautyful modded planes and the FM is as convincing as the Il-2 FM. For me the most important part in Flightsims. I hate the FMs in the microsoft simulators, they make you feel more like sitting in a rollercoaster as in a plane.
The landscape is mor authentic in CoD but in RoF it`s different, but also more than ok! Big advantage in RoF: It runs like hell-absolute fluid! And of course no "ghost-trees". For me Cod is the winner, because i love adjusting and "pressing buttons". Therefor is the WWII aviation the bigger playground for me. But that says nothing about the quality of RoF! For a fast and highly entertaining dogfight I always go for RoF-so to say, a must-buy! Especially when you`re a fan of flightsims! |
#67
|
||||
|
||||
I've decided to give Rise of Flight a try as well. I'm still committed to Cliffs of Dover, but after trying the free demo of Rise of Flight I'm very impressed!
__________________
Pilot #1 (9:40 hours flying time, 3/0/1 Fighters, 7/2/0 Bombers). RIP No.401 Squadron Forum Using ReconNZ's Pilot Log Book |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The scouts are currently $2.99 each, which has to be a bargain. Even this monster is only $6.99: That was the result of a brazen attack on the Hun forward airfield on the Syndicate server on Saturday. I got there all right, dropped my 1,650-pounder right in front of the hangers, then scarpered back over the lines, pursued by Albatrosses and Pfalz's. A mad power dive for Reims (where I knew there was plenty of AA) was only partly successful, as can be seen. I got out of it alive though...
__________________
MoBo: Asus Sabertooth X58. CPU: Intel i7 950 Quad Core 3.06Ghz overclocked to 3.80Ghz. RAM: 12 GB Corsair DDR3 (1600).
GPU: XFX 6970 2GB. PSU: 1000W Corsair. SSD: 128 GB. HDD:1 TB SATA 2. OS: Win 7 Home Premium 64bit. Case: Antec Three Hundred. Monitor: 24" Samsung. Head tracking: TrackIR 5. Sore neck: See previous. Last edited by AndyJWest; 05-08-2012 at 12:36 AM. Reason: bomb weight out by a factor of 1000... |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
RoF is really the best a sim can currently offer when it comes to "authenticity". It's still a game, of course. And I'm not even a RoF fanboy, in fact I find the game boring. But I'm aware of its qualities, and the landscape is one of them. Ok, back to 1946! Last edited by bugmenot; 05-07-2012 at 11:01 PM. |
|
|