Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #681  
Old 02-17-2008, 09:23 AM
Gibbage Gibbage is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by IvanK View Post
LOX didnt exist in WWII (edit in aircraft breathing systems)
There was LOX. Some experimental Spitfires used LOX injected into the carb as a boost. I also remember reading about LOX bottles on other aircraft. I cant remember what specific aircraft and what it was used for, but LOX did exist.
  #682  
Old 02-17-2008, 09:24 AM
Gibbage Gibbage is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggs View Post
i think that Rad damage is going to be in SoW... jsut check out this screen
http://files.games.1c.ru/il2pict/ScreenShots_001.jpg

look at the oil rad (next to the tire in the wing) its damage "hitbox" is that purple cylinder.

so yeah looks like they have that in there... not the O2 bottles tho... i dont see and cylinder behind the cockpit.
I only see the oil cooler, but I dont see a big purple box on the other side of the wing representing the rad. Oil coolers ARE modeled in IL2, but radiators are not. So that pic has me more worried then ever!!! I mean how can you NOT model radiator damage?
  #683  
Old 02-17-2008, 02:16 PM
JG52Uther's Avatar
JG52Uther JG52Uther is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,358
Default

Lets hope its just a wip shot.
  #684  
Old 02-17-2008, 08:34 PM
Biggs Biggs is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gibbage View Post
I only see the oil cooler, but I dont see a big purple box on the other side of the wing representing the rad. Oil coolers ARE modeled in IL2, but radiators are not. So that pic has me more worried then ever!!! I mean how can you NOT model radiator damage?
well with all the other hitboxes all over the plane i dout they wont include the rad as well...

maybe we should as for a screen of the spit from the OTHER side
  #685  
Old 02-17-2008, 11:50 PM
Gibbage Gibbage is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggs View Post
well with all the other hitboxes all over the plane i dout they wont include the rad as well...

maybe we should as for a screen of the spit from the OTHER side
I can only hope, but I wont assume anything till I see a screenshot from the other side.
  #686  
Old 02-18-2008, 09:27 AM
JG52Uther's Avatar
JG52Uther JG52Uther is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 2,358
Default

I honestly think that with all the effort they are putting in they won't forget the rad.
  #687  
Old 02-18-2008, 08:07 PM
Avimimus Avimimus is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 803
Default

If you're the same biggs that made the Su-2 then, combined with Gibbage, it is a good day for sightings (Its like I'm a birder accept that all I see are modellers from 2002! ).
  #688  
Old 02-19-2008, 09:10 AM
vanderstok vanderstok is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 48
Default Instruments reliability in BoB

I've just finished reading the book "The Big Show" by Clostermann. He describes how he ended up after some violent maneuvres (dogfight) in a cloud. He didn't have a clue how his aircraft was oriented, because all the instrument dials would still be spinning around. In IL2, your instruments will always work perfectly under any conditions which isn't very realistic.
Will SOW BoB see more realistic behaviour of the instruments?
  #689  
Old 02-19-2008, 12:36 PM
Bussard_1 Bussard_1 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 15
Default Two things to think on for BoB.

Presently we have a panel to select gradeable realism.
That's fine, however I believe that roll rate has been somewhat "leveled" for playability.
A better aproach might be to include full real and "playability leveled" as options in BoB.
My other request would be to have undamageable ground crew to direct you to the active runway in Coops and D/F servers.
Just an erk with 1 arm pointing left or right to help you work out where the active is from the spawn point.

Thanks for the good times to date!

!S Oleg.
  #690  
Old 02-19-2008, 07:50 PM
IvanK IvanK is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 886
Default

Gibbage I qualified my statement ref LOX i.e. in "breathing systems". I presume in your comment this was what you were referring too in terms of having tanks being included in the damage model ?. For the record only 3 spitfires were modified for LOX injection direct into the carburettor intake. A MKII P8079 in 1940, 2 MKVII's EN467 and EN470 in 1944. The system never became operational nor do I think it did with any other type.

CAGING INSTRUMENTS
Thats a good point vanderstock. That would add a nice touch of realism. Though in general the Gyro instruments could be caged by the pilot prior to combat. Once out of combat they can be uncaged and fast aligned with the real horizon in the case of artificial horizon. Once this is done then they are usable once more. This would make sudden entry into cloud in the middle of a fight a challanging affair ... how good are you on limited panel

Bussard_1 .. good idea having an AI marshaller. As is getting Roll rates right.

Last edited by IvanK; 02-19-2008 at 11:29 PM.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.