New update for ROF

But i dont mind paying for them because money aint a problem for me. My steam acount it way more than that and i hardly play any of those games because im always playing ROF so ive have had my moneys worth and then some. But for people like you that dont have much money i can see it being a problem.

[ACE-OF-ACES]

Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN

Not to send this off on another tangent, but this is a huge point, the pricing model that ROF uses, and other types like WoT, etc is a huge knock on modders and the modding community.

Why would a company release an SDK if they can make the content themselves and then sell it... think about it.

I blame Call of Duty myself...

That is a good point..

But personally I would rather pay for an add-on..

Be it a plane or what ever..

Knowing it went through the same process that all other items went through..

Because to be honest.. Most mods are not even worth the FREE price we pay for them!

In my definition of a perfect world..

It would work this way..

They would provide an SDK.. A person would develope something, say an aircraft

Than submit it to 1C.. Where 1C woudl than 'review' the aircraft 3D model, cockpit, FM, DM, etc.. to see that it meets 1C's standards

Than 1C would include it in the basline game as an update.. And post it on thier site for DLC.. And the person that made it would recive a percentage of the DLC price..

Basically just like RoF does it now, but, where a 3rd party can submit stuff and make a little coin for doing so

And if for some reason 1C decided the product was not up to 1C standards.. Said person could still offer it up for others to use.. As a 3rd party un-aproved mod for those who want to use it, but at that point it would require everyone to DL the mod to be able to play online toghter..

Basically just like IL-2 mods does it now

[JG52Krupi]

Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES

Just like the others who 'said thier piece' to which you atributed the following picture..

Which begs the question.. What size hat do you require?

But am I over there (777 forums) complaining, bringing every down no... I was asked to explain why I believe something and I did so!

I did not go around seeking an argument like you and David do.

At the end of the day ROF works and CLOD dont.

[Robert]

Originally Posted by JG52Krupi

Its only here due to the lack of a backbone, if ppl had just not bothered then it would have died the way of the dodo!

Unfortunately history has shown that human-beings will do anything to screw over there fellow man and this is just the skill less way of doing it!

I know where you're coming from. I find it slightly insulting to have to pay for gun sites. BUT. If given the option of having a hobby fail due to such a small population of interested participants or having optional paid ad ons to continue the hobby, I'd go for the paid ad ons.

I truly think our hobby is so tenuous and small that this is a viable option, despite my kicking and screaming (sometimes with credit card in hand). In this case (RoF) I don't think anyone is screwing over any one else.

[JG52Krupi]

Originally Posted by fox3

At the end of the day ROF works and CLOD dont.

CLOD works perfectly well for me!

[JG52Krupi]

I am out of this thread I have posted the truth, hopefully some here will see sense in that before putting there hands in their pocket when Jason posts another "beg for money" just so the smeg head can fill up his porsche!

Originally Posted by JG52Krupi

I am out of this thread I have posted the truth, hopefully some here will see sense in that before putting there hands in their pocket when Jason posts another "beg for money" just so the smeg head can fill up his porsche!

Have fun flying though the trees lol

[ATAG_Dutch]

I understand what you mean Krupi, but compared to what I've spent on FSX over the years, the cost of RoF add-ons is peanuts.

[Buchon]

Do can someone make the exact sum of RoF "complete edition" ?

Just to clear the matter ...