Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > FM/DM threads

FM/DM threads Everything about FM/DM in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 04-17-2012, 10:47 AM
Sutts Sutts is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 566
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robo. View Post
R.M.3.S. is stating +12lbs. as Combat Power Rating for the Merlin XII - 1280hp/3000rpm/10500ft/+12 lbs.

+12.lbs was only possible with BCC-O engaged anyway as far I know.

Take-off power was stated as 1175hp/3000rpm/+12.5 lbs

Perhaps they considered the BCC-O as maximum power hence CPR in the manual. I am sure the manual deals with the limits of the usage and reporting / justifying it's use in combat. +12lbs @ 3000rpm was maximum strain you could ever put onto that engine. There are anecdotal stories about Spitfires (I don't know if they were Merlin XIIs or IIIs tbh) scrambling to intercept a raid at some important target in Lodnon. 6 took-off, BCC-O used straight away to climb asap. The result was that some had to turn back with failures and all of them needed overhaul I suppose. I'll try to dig that story as I might be wrong with details.



Agreed completely, that would be great!

Thanks Robo, I'd really like to see that story.

Do you find it strange how they'd allow 12 Lb boost for 3 mins on take off but not in combat when the pilot's life and aircraft were at risk? Am I missing something? Does 12 Lbs boost at ground level put less strain on the engine?
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 04-17-2012, 11:08 AM
41Sqn_Banks 41Sqn_Banks is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sutts View Post
Thanks Robo, I'd really like to see that story.

Do you find it strange how they'd allow 12 Lb boost for 3 mins on take off but not in combat when the pilot's life and aircraft were at risk? Am I missing something? Does 12 Lbs boost at ground level put less strain on the engine?

Source: AP 2095 Pilot's Notes General (1st Edition, 1941)
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 04-17-2012, 11:19 AM
Sutts Sutts is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 566
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 41Sqn_Banks View Post

Source: AP 2095 Pilot's Notes General (1st Edition, 1941)

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 04-17-2012, 11:35 AM
pupaxx pupaxx is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Absurdistan - Rome
Posts: 344
Default

Here is a link about a restored spitfire
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/history/w...-71-years.html
accordly to the serial number P9374, the machine was built by Supermarine (contract n° B980385/39) in a batch of 181 machines all MkI.
The Air Restoration Company (http://www.arc-duxford.co.uk/)sited at Duxford airfield restored the plane.
my ask is: maybe some of them for sure well know about engine limitations, they took it in flight after 70 years (I dont know who is the pilot)
Some of this community with a better knowledge of english than me can contact those guys and ask for more infos!
cheers
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 04-17-2012, 11:49 AM
Sutts Sutts is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 566
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pupaxx View Post
Here is a link about a restored spitfire
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/history/w...-71-years.html
accordly to the serial number P9374, the machine was built by Supermarine (contract n° B980385/39) in a batch of 181 machines all MkI.
The Air Restoration Company (http://www.arc-duxford.co.uk/)sited at Duxford airfield restored the plane.
my ask is: maybe some of them for sure well know about engine limitations, they took it in flight after 70 years (I dont know who is the pilot)
Some of this community with a better knowledge of english than me can contact those guys and ask for more infos!
cheers
Restored aircraft operating today will almost never use maximum boost as it would risk a rare and expensive asset unnecessarily. Many don't even have an operational turbo/super charger for ease of maintenance. I think 20,000 feet would be considered high when operating warbirds these days.

Shame as the data would have been incredibly useful.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 04-17-2012, 02:56 PM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default

From Hurricane MkI Pilots Notes, Melrin II or III engine. This is a May 1941 edition - I haven't found an earlier one yet so it is possible that the combat advice differed during the BoB. I'll re-check the Library. However, the engines were the same.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg HurricaneBoost1.jpg (731.1 KB, 36 views)
File Type: jpg HurricaneBoost2.jpg (845.2 KB, 31 views)
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders

Last edited by klem; 04-17-2012 at 02:59 PM. Reason: adiitional image added
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 04-17-2012, 03:46 PM
Sutts Sutts is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 566
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by klem View Post
From Hurricane MkI Pilots Notes, Melrin II or III engine. This is a May 1941 edition - I haven't found an earlier one yet so it is possible that the combat advice differed during the BoB. I'll re-check the Library. However, the engines were the same.
Interesting stuff Klem, thanks for posting.

I find it quite hard to overspeed my prop - certainly not to 3600 RPM. Is there any situation on CloD where that kind of overspeed is possible?
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 04-17-2012, 05:28 PM
Robo.'s Avatar
Robo. Robo. is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sutts View Post
Interesting stuff Klem, thanks for posting.

I find it quite hard to overspeed my prop - certainly not to 3600 RPM. Is there any situation on CloD where that kind of overspeed is possible?
Not with the Rotol equipped Hurricane, these limits were set to the engine in general - Merlin II and III. Following airscrews have been fitted on Hurricanes of that era: Weybridge fixed pitch, de Havilland 2-pitch or Rotol constant speed. With the first two, you could indeed overrev your engine in a dive, hence the limit set in the pilot's manual. You will be able to overrev your engine in the sime flying de Havilland Mk.I fighters (Spitfire Mk.I and DH-20 Hurricane Mk.I),

klem - I do have great copy of Hurricane Mk.I pilot notes and maintenance manual dated March 1939, all pre-BoB Merlin II and III related. Great stuff, PM me if you'd care for a copy.
__________________
Bobika.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 04-17-2012, 06:02 PM
Sutts Sutts is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 566
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robo. View Post
Not with the Rotol equipped Hurricane, these limits were set to the engine in general - Merlin II and III. Following airscrews have been fitted on Hurricanes of that era: Weybridge fixed pitch, de Havilland 2-pitch or Rotol constant speed. With the first two, you could indeed overrev your engine in a dive, hence the limit set in the pilot's manual. You will be able to overrev your engine in the sime flying de Havilland Mk.I fighters (Spitfire Mk.I and DH-20 Hurricane Mk.I),

klem - I do have great copy of Hurricane Mk.I pilot notes and maintenance manual dated March 1939, all pre-BoB Merlin II and III related. Great stuff, PM me if you'd care for a copy.
Thanks Robo, I forgot it wasn't a constant speed prop on these early machines Dohhh! The reason I ask is that I've seen reference to overspeeding props in manuals for aircraft with constant speed units fitted and was wondering under what circumstances an overspeed could happen.

I guess slamming the throttle to max when going into a dive might not give the constant speed unit time to adjust?
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 04-17-2012, 07:10 PM
Robo.'s Avatar
Robo. Robo. is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sutts View Post
I guess slamming the throttle to max when going into a dive might not give the constant speed unit time to adjust?
Exactly.
__________________
Bobika.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.