![]() |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have more of an issue with the Stuka in this regard. When locked into the sight you cannot look far enough to the left or right enough to be able to judge your dive angle.
IMHO for the Stuka you shoould be able to llok further to the right when locked into the sight so you can see the angle lines on the cockpit. otherwise accurate dive bombing is really quite difficult. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
... Sorry, but I can only close my right eye thats why I shoot a gun as a lefthander. Actually I am a righthander!
But I must say, the gunsights in the BF109 in Cliffs of Dover are a pain in the a... No british plane has such weird gunsights. And its not true that german pilots had to aim with one eye closed because of their gunsights, that is rubbish! I knew a real german pilot of that time and he would tell you its crap. The sight was not exactly positioned in the center, ok you had to lean a bit forward also ok, but you did not have to twist yourself like a corkscrew like you have to do in Cliffs of Dover just to see the crosshairs! Aiming with only one eye is also crap, you loose the in depth perception and you have no feeling for distance anymore. I have track-IR4 and it works well with 6DOF and all that comes with it. I dont intend to buy track-IR5 just because of that messed up gunsight of the 109! You can use it but you have to move and twist arround in your cockpit in order to see the crosshairs, thats rediculous and dont tell me real pilots also had to do that! Make it usable like the one in the old IL2 flightsim (and that was not arcade)! This one here is a joke! ![]() Last edited by Pluto; 04-21-2011 at 08:35 AM. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
All this move your head to the right twist a bit and close your eye shit is crap, nobody ever aimed like that! ![]() |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
what you're saying there flies in the face of historical accuracy which has been presented... can you back up, with historically accurate data, what you're whinging about there?
__________________
Intel 980x | eVGA X58 FTW | Intel 180Gb 520 SSD x 2 | eVGA GTX 580 | Corsair Vengeance 1600 x 12Gb | Windows 7 Ultimate (SP1) 64 bit | Corsair 550D | Corsair HX 1000 PSU | Eaton 1500va UPS | Warthog HOTAS w/- Saitek rudders | Samsung PX2370 Monitor | Deathadder 3500 mouse | MS X6 Keyboard | TIR4 Stand alone Collector's Edition DCS Series Even duct tape can't fix stupid... but it can muffle the sound. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I say keep the sight where it is historically but allow to switch to sight view with pressed button. I proposed a solution that me thinks does the trick and still sticks to realism as closely as possible and should allow still the immersivity and allow nonetheless to have realistic aiming with 109 sight. And it would even allow people who like the current way to continue.
Solution: A button push should save temporarily the current head position like shift+f1 in old IL2. As long as this button is pushed this new position is maintained until the button is released. Of course head shake and g effects would be still working. So for aiming I would have to lean to the right finding the good position for aiming (which could be also quite difficult in the outcome), I press button and keep it pushed. So now my head position is locked to this saved position and I can view normally as I would with normal centre head position. I now have to steer and shoot while keeping the button constantly pushed (not THAT easy to do) in order to stay centred on sight. When I release my head will jump back to cockpit centre position. If you prefer the old ways you still could just lean right. Those people shouting that this would dump down realism just don't understand that this thread is there because of available computer hardware which makes aiming with 109 currently absolutely unrealistic. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() I think what Rattlehead suggests is the best solution. We're walking in a grey area when it comes to defending absolute realism in a pc flight simulator, therefore it might be wise to get it like in IL-2. |
#57
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not gonna happen. They will never, ever move the sight in the bf109. This game is about realism. Luthier and the dev team will never compromise the models. And i hope they never do!
After playing the game awhile you won't even bother using the sight. You will "know" when to fire anyways.
__________________
I7-3930K CPU w/ Corsair H60 liquid cooling. 16Gb Corsair Vengeance 1866mhz. Asus P9X79 Deluxe Motherboard. Asus GTX680 2Gb SLI Auzentech Home theater 3D Soundcard. Corsair HX850 Modular PSU. Win 7 x64 Ultimate TM Warthog HOTAS. TM Cougar MFD's. Saitek Flight Pro pedals. TrackIr 5. Samsung Syncmaster 2770FH LCD. Last edited by Raggz; 04-21-2011 at 08:46 AM. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() Unfortunately I cant ask this former pilot anymore because he is dead for 6 years now but he would tell you the same and by the way, I am not whining! I just state something concerning that "highly accurate" flightsim! (but dont get me wrong, apart from certain "bugs" its a great new sim and I like it ![]() Last edited by Pluto; 04-21-2011 at 08:51 AM. |
#59
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If they change the position of the gunsight of german aircraft I will snap my CD in half.
Go fly another plane or play another game if you don't like this one.
__________________
![]() Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL. CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10. INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4. |
#60
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
![]() Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL. CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10. INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4. |
![]() |
|
|