Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #501  
Old 04-16-2012, 03:31 PM
Kurfürst Kurfürst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 705
Default

The Spit II rolls too fast, the Hurri rolls a bit too slow. Sorry if it was misunderstandable.
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200
Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415

Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org
Reply With Quote
  #502  
Old 04-16-2012, 03:32 PM
Insuber Insuber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paris - France
Posts: 1,406
Default

look at the link he provided, it's clearer.
Reply With Quote
  #503  
Old 04-16-2012, 03:53 PM
taildraggernut taildraggernut is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 334
Default

8 seconds for a 90 deg roll at 400mph in a spit II.....yeah sure, now give your sphincter a break and start talking sense.
Reply With Quote
  #504  
Old 04-16-2012, 04:01 PM
Osprey's Avatar
Osprey Osprey is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gloucestershire, England
Posts: 1,264
Default

As long as it's documented by RAE in a proper test for the period then I will believe it. Even if it is 8 seconds it out rolls the 109 @ 400mph. The 109 roll is better below about 300mph and improves as speed slows.
Reply With Quote
  #505  
Old 04-16-2012, 05:59 PM
Falstaff
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Taildraggernut said:

>>you are demonstrating a total failure of charisma, it really doesn't hurt to be polite. <<

Then Taildraggernut said:

>>yeah sure, now give your sphincter a break and start talking sense. <<
Reply With Quote
  #506  
Old 04-16-2012, 06:02 PM
5./JG27.Farber 5./JG27.Farber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,958
Default

Anyway, about the Bf109's speed...

#puts on helmit#

The recoreded speed by anyone side, RAF or Luftwaffe, is not achievable in game...
Reply With Quote
  #507  
Old 04-16-2012, 06:21 PM
Insuber Insuber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paris - France
Posts: 1,406
Default

Again ... FM vs. historical performances is an important aspect, but the playability is more affected by the contact visibility issue atm.
Reply With Quote
  #508  
Old 04-16-2012, 06:27 PM
fruitbat's Avatar
fruitbat fruitbat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: S E England
Posts: 1,065
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Insuber View Post
Again ... FM vs. historical performances is an important aspect, but the playability is more affected by the contact visibility issue atm.
Agreed on both counts.

I hope that the cloaking device fitted on planes at med range is fixed in the up coming patch, as as to fm's debate, i see it as pointless until we have our hands on the patch.
Reply With Quote
  #509  
Old 04-16-2012, 06:36 PM
taildraggernut taildraggernut is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 334
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falstaff View Post
Taildraggernut said:

>>you are demonstrating a total failure of charisma, it really doesn't hurt to be polite. <<

Then Taildraggernut said:

>>yeah sure, now give your sphincter a break and start talking sense. <<
Are you stalking me? I thought it was a polite way to say stop talking crap.
Reply With Quote
  #510  
Old 04-16-2012, 06:53 PM
335th_GRAthos 335th_GRAthos is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,240
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moggy View Post
The data I sent in also had some information not relating to the Battle of Britain Hurricane but earlier models.
I am sorry to be persistent Moggy,

I do not give a rat's xxxx how the fuel tanks of the Hurricane Mk.I work (or don't).

What I understand between the lines is that you gave them historical data regarding the Hurricane MK.I including performance data.
The performance data you gave to them are historically correct but due to the test environment used, they do not reflect the maximum performance of the Hurricane.

Now, for some reason, you decide to wonder whether 1c used the data you provided them with, although you do not have any indication that they used it, rather the contrary (they thanked Sean and not you).

Which brings up following troubling aspects:

#1. This reminds me of the cases when people give loaded guns to children and then wonder why accidents happen... Responsibility and foresight of what our actions may cause is important in this world.

#2. What do you want to achieve mentioning what you mentioned???? ("I pray that...")
- That we congratulate you for your XXXXXXX???? <- I live the choice of descriptive word at your discretion and judgement
- That we congratulate 1c for their XXXXXXX for using historical data they should not be using ???? <- I live the choice of descriptive word to anybody's imagination
- That we all run like scareless chicken because the Hurricane will now be running with 87oct performance instead of 150oct (do not know what the current oct rate is for the day, I lost count). ?????

Besides, since you are not Sean why on earth do you open a discussion aknowledging something which could potentialy make people consider congratulating you for your XXXXXXX???? <- I live the choice of descriptive word at your discretion and judgement


And what for?
we have not seen how the frigging Hurricane performs as per the new patch that we do not have!



~S~

I am sorry to lash out on you, it is not personal and I mean no insult, it is just that you gave me an excellent example to point out some of the madness that has been going on since last Friday's announcement.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.