Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 06-12-2012, 03:39 PM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

Beowulf,

that is really too hard on the typical fighterpilots ego, after all they are the majority on the usual servers, taking themselves much too much important.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 06-12-2012, 03:45 PM
ATAG_MajorBorris's Avatar
ATAG_MajorBorris ATAG_MajorBorris is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 342
Default Escorts

To bad fighters cant recieve points for successful escort
__________________
ASUS Sabertooth MB--Intel 2600k@4.7--EVGA GTX580 3GB--Corasir 1200 watt psu--Corsair 16gb 1866--Corsair H70 cooler--Corsair 650d case--OCZ Vertex 3--Track IR5--CH Eclipse Yoke--CH Trottle Quadrant--CH MFP--CH Rudders-MSFF2
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 06-13-2012, 07:47 AM
csThor csThor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: somewhere in Germany
Posts: 1,213
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bewolf View Post
+2
I'd even go so far to decrease the points for aircraft and/or increase the points for ground targets. Ground targets is what air warfare is all about, fighters are merely there to ensure/prevent that.
I'm not a fan of that, either, simply because individual ground targets are not a criteria to evaluate the performance of a medium bomber. Theirs were are targets such as railway stations, critical supply roads and all those things which the military calls "lines of communication". IMO anyone who flies a bomber, Stuka or dedicated ground-attack aircraft (but not fighter-bombers) should get a point value per survived mission, maybe 0.1 points so that 10 survived missions equate one aerial victory over a single-engined fighter.

The problem with area targets in general is that they'd need to have a function so that damaging or destroying them would have a direct impact on certain aspects of gameplay. But for that a full-blown supply system would have to be programmed and that is a beast to do right.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 06-13-2012, 09:00 PM
ATAG_MajorBorris's Avatar
ATAG_MajorBorris ATAG_MajorBorris is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 342
Default

Type:Bug


Aircraft:Ju88


Description:Low FPS when in cockpit.


Tested:Online


Workarounds:Lower graphics settings helps a little.


Additional Information: When panning the view in cockpit of a Ju88 while the engines are running, severe fps hit when looking at the engine especialy when parked.
__________________
ASUS Sabertooth MB--Intel 2600k@4.7--EVGA GTX580 3GB--Corasir 1200 watt psu--Corsair 16gb 1866--Corsair H70 cooler--Corsair 650d case--OCZ Vertex 3--Track IR5--CH Eclipse Yoke--CH Trottle Quadrant--CH MFP--CH Rudders-MSFF2
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 06-13-2012, 09:16 PM
Redroach's Avatar
Redroach Redroach is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bavaria, Germany
Posts: 709
Default

Can we all agree that things like scoring or "destructible airfields" (lol?) are currently at the other end of the universe?
I hope this thread rouses itself back up regarding bomber bugs...
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 06-13-2012, 09:43 PM
ATAG_MajorBorris's Avatar
ATAG_MajorBorris ATAG_MajorBorris is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 342
Default Redroach's universe

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redroach View Post
Can we all agree that things like scoring or "destructible airfields" (lol?) are currently at the other end of the universe?
I hope this thread rouses itself back up regarding bomber bugs...
Though I am of the opinion that CoD online mission editors have been neglected to some degree and that missions that are exciting and immersive have as much importance to the success of CoD/Bombers as anything, Im sure Blackdog will edit this thread and push the bugs to the top and related banter to the bottom.

Thank you Redroach for your honesty but I must ask, are you doing anything to help the bombers on this side of the universe?
__________________
ASUS Sabertooth MB--Intel 2600k@4.7--EVGA GTX580 3GB--Corasir 1200 watt psu--Corsair 16gb 1866--Corsair H70 cooler--Corsair 650d case--OCZ Vertex 3--Track IR5--CH Eclipse Yoke--CH Trottle Quadrant--CH MFP--CH Rudders-MSFF2
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 06-14-2012, 10:37 AM
Redroach's Avatar
Redroach Redroach is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bavaria, Germany
Posts: 709
Default

I wrote/inquired about numerous bugs, bomber and non-bomber, over a year ago. Still pending, though.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 06-14-2012, 12:46 PM
Stealth_Eagle Stealth_Eagle is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: In a world alone.
Posts: 147
Post Some updates for you

I did some more test flights for you Blackdog. The BR. 20 bug is solvable by returning to the pilot and toggling the brake since the AI engages it while it's trying to take off. Some new glitches that I found while flying: the BR 20's instruments go to low resolution if you crash land and survive which is just an annoyance factor rather than a true bug, the Ju 87 when crash landed as well, has double examples of certain things, and finally the Ju 88's gunners have glitched trigger fingers where it won't shoot at once and there is no reload animation for it.
Sorry for not putting it into proper form but I didn't have much time to write this up in order to do such since I have to get things prepared for a service project that I am going off to for a week.

Eagle
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 06-14-2012, 05:43 PM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default

As long as the tangent discussions

1) stay relevant to the use of bombers in the sim and
2) don't outnumber the bug reporting posts( if they do, then there is enough interest to have their own thread)

i'm fine with it.

I just haven't had the time to edit everything into the list yet, i hope i'll be able to do it during the weekend. Keep up the good work everyone
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 06-18-2012, 12:05 AM
Freycinet Freycinet is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 696
Default

I flew the 109E-4 on ATAG tonight and noticed that the auto prop pitch didn't work properly. I had to put it in manual for take-off and only engage auto when up high and at speed and then it worked ok. Also, the arming panel for the bombs seemed to not work any longer: no switch to toggle with mouse.

Before the patch there was no problem with either auto pitch or bomb arming in the E-4.

Do anyone have the same issues? - Sorry if this has already been mentioned.
__________________
My Il-2 CoD video web site: www.flightsimvids.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.