Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 09-25-2011, 04:04 PM
GOZR GOZR is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: France - USA
Posts: 386
Default

__________________
-GOZR

http://www.gozr.net/iocl/
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 09-25-2011, 04:07 PM
Osprey's Avatar
Osprey Osprey is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Gloucestershire, England
Posts: 1,264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fjordmonkey View Post
Far less to deal with than CLoD? Okay, you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, my friend.

CLoD, while involving and has a lot to deal with, is actually quite simple in terms of the technology behind the aircraft, systems etc. Yes, it might be easier to fly in the A10C since you do have systems helping you, but you have a VAST array of systems, functions and instruments you have to keep an eye on at all time, know how, when and when not to operate them, plus the fact that the AI takes absolutely no prisoners.

Comparing the two in terms of complexity is like comparing apples to bananas. Both are fruits, both grow on trees and both taste good, but that's where the comparison ends.

As Cheesehawk also mentions, it takes a damn lot more in order to accurately employ weapons in DCS:A10C than it does in CLoD, although CLoD isn't a slouch when it comes to that either.
No, I do. I'm talking about DM, bullet ballistics in an MO - you don't dogfight in an A-10 so DCS doesn't need to concern itself with these more intensive types of calculation. Whilst your systems in DCS may be telling you something they are not functioning programmatically like the real thing, they just behave like the real thing in order to give you the experience. This isn't going to be as intensive.

I'm not taking anything away from DCS here, it does look fantastic, but the real workload is on the user and not the hardware when it comes to the software itself. It's not that it's more efficient, it's just that it plainly does less.

Last edited by Osprey; 09-25-2011 at 04:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 09-25-2011, 04:40 PM
seaeye seaeye is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 100
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skouras View Post
thats a sniper pod not a TGP
BTW
Nice photo
That isn't a Sniper Pod.

Here's a Sniper Pod, as fitted to the now defunct RAF Harrier:



I remember having to constantly fit these damn things to GR9s during a deployment to KAF. We only had 2 of them at the time. The pilots rated them so highly over the TIALD pods that if the A/C carring the Sniper went U/S the insisted it be put onto another immediately! Such a pain in the arse, but I guess that's the reason I was there..!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.