Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 07-19-2011, 02:54 PM
Rattlehead Rattlehead is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 727
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nearmiss View Post
This is really an excellent forums, because we have voices speaking up from all over the world. We may not all agree, but basically we do get along. I love it we can speak with other members from all over the world, and share things with some common interest.
This is so true. As a kid or young teen, I always wished I could meet other people who liked the same games I did, or just speak to people about common interests, whatever they were. Yes I had friends, but I mean a big community.
The 'net has given us all a voice (not always a good thing!) and it's great that we can all discuss things without having to mail a letter and wait ages for a reply.
If I could change one small thing on this forum, it would be to have an off-topic forum (or at least a thread) on the main page. I know the 1c forums has an off-topic forum, but I've grown used to the members on this forum. No big deal I suppose, just saying.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 07-19-2011, 03:01 PM
Ze-Jamz Ze-Jamz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: On your six!!
Posts: 2,302
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rattlehead View Post
This is so true. As a kid or young teen, I always wished I could meet other people who liked the same games I did, or just speak to people about common interests, whatever they were. Yes I had friends, but I mean a big community.
The 'net has given us all a voice (not always a good thing!) and it's great that we can all discuss things without having to mail a letter and wait ages for a reply.
If I could change one small thing on this forum, it would be to have an off-topic forum (or at least a thread) on the main page. I know the 1c forums has an off-topic forum, but I've grown used to the members on this forum. No big deal I suppose, just saying.
A 'Banter' forum..
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 07-19-2011, 03:08 PM
Sternjaeger II Sternjaeger II is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rattlehead View Post
If I could change one small thing on this forum, it would be to have an off-topic forum (or at least a thread) on the main page. I know the 1c forums has an off-topic forum, but I've grown used to the members on this forum. No big deal I suppose, just saying.
+1.
I asked before, they stubbornly keep on pointing us to the generic off topic forum, they don't seem to understand that we want our own off topic forum.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 07-19-2011, 06:04 PM
Blackdog_kt Blackdog_kt is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,715
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK View Post
The quality of the forum reflects the game.
The quality of the forum reflects the average quality of the posters. There are problems in the game but when so many are so busy with the negative stuff that don't even dare to delve into whatever actually works as it should (and there is such a thing, if you haven't found out about it you're just not looking or don't care to find it), this "i want to be disappointed" attitude spills over into the forums, it's like a teenage suicide cult seeking new converts with all the "you're not having fun with the game, you're just too much of a fanboy to realize it" rhetoric, as if they know what each individual member of the community is looking for and prioritizes in a game

Personally, if i were to rank my pet peeves with the sim, the topics that get the most exposure (SLI/Crossfire, FSAA, sound engine) would be on the "almost don't give a you know what" part of the scale, while things like inconsistent controls and missing/not working aircraft systems would be ranking at first place, but you won't see me calling people idiots for having a fit over a non-antialiased radio aerial. People have different priorities and there's a vocal minority here that has a great deal of difficulty accepting this. Too bad for them i guess, because it's obvious that they don't represent everyone and on top of that, the more aggressively they try to push their agenda the more some level headed guys will become aggressive in return and campaign for their own set of preferred fixes to take precedence.

Remember when some of us were advocating optional clickable cockpits during development, so that we don't have to map and remember a gazillion different functions for all the new aircraft systems? A big part of the community was convinced, the developers were convinced, even some people posted here and thanked us for advocating something that at the point seemed pointless to them.

My point being, i can argue for a certain feature with the necessary consistency and do it without insulting people, so that i end up getting "converts to the cause" but i haven't been busting everyone's fuzzy dice on every single thread left and right to get them to fix my preferred issues ahead of everything else.

Seeing the tactics prevailing in the forum, maybe i was wrong. Maybe i should take up a forum campaign to have all the system modeling issues in every single flyable fixed before SLI and FSAA optimizations, just to get on some people's nerves and give them a taste of their own medicine.

I bet it will be infinitely easier to do for the developers as well, since most of the times it's simply some mismatched switches or a missing function in one aircraft that can be directly copied over from another one. I bet it's so much easier to do than fix FSAA and optimize texture loading and it carries enough weight in the gameplay side of things, that we might stand a very good chance of convincing the developers they should focus on that. The only thing that's stopping me is that it's summer time and i can't be bothered spending the weekends in front of the PC, but if the usual suspects keep repeating their rants and the game isn't fixed by mid-August i might just take up the crusade just to grind their gears and show them for once what it's like for the rest of us to be on the receiving end of their barrage

Sure, there are problems in the game and there's a couple dozen things i'd personally like to see changed or improved, but let's call a spade a spade here: some people have drummed up a whole lot of disruptive commotion, driven away whatever positive minded, contributing members, therefore putting a stop to whatever 3rd party/community improvements and involvement existed in spite of all the problems, and now they claim it's not because of their attitudes but something else.

I generally try to be smooth around the edges but maybe it detracts from getting the message across, so i think it's time to hammer the point home for once. If some people feel neglected by the developers they should at least not drive away whatever community members are working to improve THEIR gameplay experience. In other words, the best piece of advice i could offer to the nameless "whiner" of this forum is:

"If you can't present your complaints in a useful, non-aggravating way then either shut up for a while as the rest of the community tries to fix the game for you, or get stuck with a forever broken game and be forced to shut up once and for all because there'll be nothing to complain about in the long run. Your choice."


In other words,

Quote:
Originally Posted by White Owl View Post
Irrationally hating IL-2: Dover has become a religion for some. To a lesser extent, irrationally loving the game is also a religion for a few here. (Everybody has at least one religion, whether they realize it or not.) When you're trying to have a conversation with somebody who zealously practices a religion opposed to your own point of view, the big problem is the zealot is incapable of stepping back and reconsidering his own point of view. He genuinely believes he is being perfectly reasonable in aggressive proselytizing, and it's for your own good. The only solution is to not engage the zealots and look around for somebody more open minded to talk to. They can be harder to find, but they're out there.

Also, there's a subtle difference between a troll and an attention... word-that-means-prostitute. Learn to differentiate, and resist the impulse to give either of them what they crave. Getting angry at them serves no useful purpose. Ignore and move on.
a big +1 to the preceding quote.

Last edited by Blackdog_kt; 07-19-2011 at 06:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 07-19-2011, 06:29 PM
furbs's Avatar
furbs furbs is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,039
Default

Blackdog, i like you.

But you do know that Luthier hasnt logged in here, or at the Russian forum since the 1st of July right?

The guy isn't listening to us at all.

Whats the point of posting a bug thread if the guys not reading it.
__________________
Furbs, Tree and Falstaff...The COD killers...
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 07-19-2011, 06:33 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by furbs View Post
Blackdog, i like you.

But you do know that Luthier hasnt logged in here, or at the Russian forum since the 1st of July right?

The guy isn't listening to us at all.

Whats the point of posting a bug thread if the guys not reading it.

I don't blame him. This forum has become a steaming pile.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 07-19-2011, 06:37 PM
Anvilfolk Anvilfolk is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 141
Default

Hear hear, Blackdog.

furbs: Or maybe he doesn't automatically log in as Luthier. Instead, he pops in his head as a guest (to avoid a dozen threads like "LUTHIER WAS HERE AND DIDN'T SAY ANYTHING!!!!11one WE ARE ABANDONED!!!!11one"), sees donkeys and goats all around, a majority of threads created by the same half-a-dozen people with the same useless message as far as game development is concerned, and just doesn't bother.

I know I wouldn't.

<cue in the funny "haha" Cartman reported image>
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 07-19-2011, 06:45 PM
carguy_ carguy_ is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: optimist
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by furbs View Post
Whats the point of posting a bug thread if the guys not reading it.
You can`t possibly know that.

Right on, Antiwilvolk. The half-dozen crowd seems to present a behaviour of building quality by quantity of posts. Like little cells connecting. Little do they know, that doesn`t add anything to the spamfest they have created.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 07-19-2011, 06:49 PM
BigPickle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carguy_ View Post
You can`t possibly know that.

Right on, Antiwilvolk. The half-dozen crowd seems to present a behaviour of building quality by quantity of posts. Like little cells connecting. Little do they know, that doesn`t add anything to the spamfest they have created.
We love you
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 07-19-2011, 07:03 PM
AARPRazorbacks AARPRazorbacks is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: SEC, USA. WPS
Posts: 222
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPickle View Post
We love you
BIGpickle,
Are you making more sound mods for the sim?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.