Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 04-21-2011, 11:35 AM
Gerfaut Gerfaut is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Insuber View Post
...We are not speaking about the 69 euros of my CE, but rather than the credibility of 1C / MG and of the involved individuals, and in turn of the long term success of this series.

Believe me: telling the full truth to the customers, and a path forward to clear the issues, is less painful than letting them discover it by themselves, or learn it from frustrated ex-employees. Take action, please!
+1
... and couldn't agree more. common sense and crystal clear feeling about overall stakes.
*applause*


C'mon Luthier, be strong.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 04-21-2011, 12:33 PM
C_G C_G is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 95
Default

Honestly, who cares what happened behind the scenes?
Is it reasonable to be upset that the game released is missing a number of features advertised And/or buggy?
Absolutely.
Why that was the case is an perhaps an interesting topic for speculation but I don't see how we have any right to know nor does the dev have an obligation to inform us about all the difficult decisions and troubles they may or may not have had.

The dev has an obligation to fix the problems And deliver on its advertised features in a timely manner it doesn't have to tell you what caused the problems.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 04-21-2011, 12:37 PM
LcSummers LcSummers is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C_G View Post
Honestly, who cares what happened behind the scenes?
Is it reasonable to be upset that the game released is missing a number of features advertised And/or buggy?
Absolutely.
Why that was the case is an perhaps an interesting topic for speculation but I don't see how we have any right to know nor does the dev have an obligation to inform us about all the difficult decisions and troubles they may or may not have had.

The dev has an obligation to fix the problems And deliver on its advertised features in a timely manner it doesn't have to tell you what caused the problems.
1+

Look at Silent Hunter 5. One crapy patch and thats all.

And COD? 3 patches in 3 weeks. I really like this team trying everything to make us feel happy.

Last edited by LcSummers; 04-21-2011 at 12:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 04-21-2011, 12:44 PM
41Sqn_Banks 41Sqn_Banks is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 644
Default

Let the devs concentrate on the game. There is no need to waste time on dirty laundry.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 04-21-2011, 12:46 PM
BigPickle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Honest Communication is all I want, no fibs to hold back the whining it always fails,

Its like telling a girl you like that you love her so you dont hurt her feelings, in the long run she is hurt more because she finds out its all been a lie.

This coummunity is a big rosie cheeked chubby girl Luthier
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 04-21-2011, 12:53 PM
FG28_Kodiak FG28_Kodiak is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Swabia->Bavaria->Germany
Posts: 884
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 41Sqn_Banks View Post
Let the devs concentrate on the game. There is no need to waste time on dirty laundry.
+1

I am not interested in recrimination, nor i am interested in exuses, i am only interested in solutions.

And again a complete waste of time thread in this forum.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 04-21-2011, 01:06 PM
41Sqn_Banks 41Sqn_Banks is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 644
Default

I'd rather have a statement from Luthier what they are currently working on
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 04-21-2011, 01:12 PM
David603 David603 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: 6'clock high
Posts: 713
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heliocon View Post
+1
What we are seeing in IL2 should not be problematic on modern rigs. The fact that there are no tree hitboxes but they "supposedly" (not idea if they do) track each bullet is insanse - you can track a bullet but not a tree?
Trees are a graphical feature which can be turned off. Hence for the sake of online gameplay and mission building they cannot have hitboxes.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 04-21-2011, 01:41 PM
Insuber Insuber is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Paris - France
Posts: 1,406
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by C_G View Post
Honestly, who cares what happened behind the scenes?
Nobody cares.

Let's try again: we need an honest statement re. the current status of development, missing features and their status, and the plan to correct things so to have something similar to the advertised product. Simple.

Car makers, Intel and home appliance makers have learned long ago to communicate publicly the defects of their products and offer either a compensation or a fix. The position "do not disturb the driver" is simply not acceptable for paying customers.

Cheers,
Insuber
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 04-21-2011, 01:43 PM
David Hayward David Hayward is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,183
Default

Those of you expecting the devs of this game to provide detailed information for every aspect of this game are living in a fantasy. No company is ever going to do anything like that.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.