![]() |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They should have put the 51 in the lead.
![]() |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Something for the Brits in the audience. The RAF's demo team in action...
![]() |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() Oshkosh 2009. Love polished planes. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The only problem with polish is lens flare.
![]() |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now we're talking.
As far as my personal taste goes fighters should look brutish, not elegant and pretty, which makes the 190 the best looking fighter of the war for me. The P-47 takes second place for similar reasons and then i also like the sight of bombed-up Hurricane IICs, mosquitoes, luftwaffe nightfighters and so on. No offense to the fans of Ponys and Spitfires, it's just that compared to the "uglier" and beefier planes they look a bit "girly" for lack of a better word: "Oooh, don't touch me, i'm single-engined, liquid cooled and break easily" ![]() |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A big jug of ugly...
![]() |
#47
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
PMSL......thanks I nearly choked on my tea!!! some members would have been very gratefull, I do agree if fighting aircraft should have a look it would be as you describe. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() 2 of the best ![]() |
#49
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
OK, I'm in. Just some different angles I took.
|
#50
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here we have some more from work.
|
![]() |
|
|