Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 04-07-2011, 05:37 PM
Theshark888 Theshark888 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kikuchiyo View Post
Good post! The best intentions don't really mean much but I will keep an open mind and hope (pray) for the best

Now get this thing in order so you can start working on the North African campaign
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 04-07-2011, 10:12 PM
41Sqn_Stormcrow
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I think this is a good place to express my gratitude for this product even if it still has quite a few flaws. I know with our support there'll be a happy end with this dev team.

It will be a milestone in flight simulation and it is already outstanding in many features.

Please don't get frustrated by those negative comments. Not everybody thinks negatively nor has given up on this game.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 04-07-2011, 10:46 PM
Mango Mango is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 91
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cpt.Badger View Post
Or you can actually do something good with that money, i.e spend it on charity.

This thread has this distinctive smell... the smell of hopeless fanboism.
It's the dirty smell of simmers who didn't shower because they continually had to play "one last mission!", and want the small software shops to keep putting out more sims.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 04-07-2011, 10:54 PM
Strike Strike is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 684
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mango View Post
It's the dirty smell of simmers who didn't shower because they continually had to play "one last mission!", and want the small software shops to keep putting out more sims.
I think it's the foul cheeze everyone eats with their whine here.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 04-08-2011, 01:30 AM
OldBuzzard OldBuzzard is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strike View Post
I think it's the foul cheeze everyone eats with their whine here.
No, it's the smell of the s*** sandwich, made with moldy bread, that UBI/1C/Oleg delivered to us (the IL2 community), after promising us Filet Mignon for the last 6-8 years.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 04-08-2011, 01:36 AM
doghous3 doghous3 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 168
Default

I haven't followed the development of this game at all. But I consistently see posters quoting a range from 6-10years..

Is there actually any official statement made by the developer's of when they actually sat down and decided to make CoD.

Not suggesting people are pulling figures out of the air mind, it's just a fleeting thought as to how long they actually have spent developing it.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 04-08-2011, 02:12 AM
adonys adonys is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 850
Default

if you'd ask me, I'd say 2-3 years at most, with the two programmers which actually appears in credits.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 04-08-2011, 10:24 AM
easytarget3 easytarget3 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Prague,Czech Republic
Posts: 91
Default

Hey guys,
iam with you, dont give up,continue support please, it will be very good sim with some of the best features ever made. even now i enjoy it.Big thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 04-08-2011, 10:56 AM
6S.Maraz's Avatar
6S.Maraz 6S.Maraz is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 55
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strike View Post
Right now all I can say is thank you very very much not for bringing us the sim we are playing right now today, but the evolving product you are bringing us each and every day you keep putting your work into this masterpiece to be. I am one of those that believe this sim is the "ugly duckling" (not in a visual aspect! The game is beautiful) and will only get better with time!
Yes, really beautiful!
This is London as seen by a PC within the official specifications (XP, DX9):


Actually, when being sold, a game is supposed to be a complete product, not a beta...

Maraz
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 04-08-2011, 11:33 AM
bongodriver's Avatar
bongodriver bongodriver is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,546
Default

Quote:
Actually, when being sold, a game is supposed to be a complete product, not a beta...
in principle this is true, but Eagle dynamics took money for access to a pre release beta, many products with all the best will in the world do get released that don't come up to expectation, I have used iPhone as an example before, but when iPhone was launched with all the hype and promises, people were camping outside of the shops to buy it (I did enjoy laughing at all those people that bought £500's worth of junk) but it got fixed in the end, so why is COD such a big deal? stuff like this happens, my life didn't end bcause COD needs fixing.

p.s. another example for you, anyone checked put Fighter Ops? they are taking money annually just so people can see some pics of promises, tally up several years worth of Area 51 subscriptions and then the game release cost.......will it be worth it? will it work out of the box?

Last edited by bongodriver; 04-08-2011 at 11:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.