#41
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Jeez, I can only thank you. Don't listen to them. Every video is appreciated. |
#42
|
||||
|
||||
Nice one...
__________________
JG2 Spitfire Trinken für den Frieden - Schmiedet Schwerter zu Zapfhähnen !!! System Asus M4A89GTD PRO/USB3 |AMD Phenom II X6 Black Edition 1090T 6x 3.20GHz | 8GB RAM DDR3 | Sapphire HD6950 2048MB | 2x Samsung 750GB Raid0 |Windows 7 Home Premium x64 | HOTAS Cougar | Simped Vario Pro |TrackIR 2 |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Never mind them, thanks for the video.
-m Quote:
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
It does look good , the freezing is a bummer but that is probably a pretty easy fix.
|
#45
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I have a i7 950, 6GB Corsair Dominator Ram and am just about to get an Nvidia 560 TI Frozr. I have not overclocked the i7 so I am at stock 3.05 Ghz. I should be fine, but his system is not by any means low-end (and I know you never said low-end, but Higher Spec is for probably 2% of the rest of the players!") It's good to hear Luth' saying bugs are being worked on....but 3-days and counting.....crossing my fingers for 1C Cheers, MP
__________________
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
I had a post ready to go and then the forum temporarily became unavailable so i lost it
Repeating what i was about to say, thanks for taking the time to upload this. I agree the sound mixing could benefit from some tweaking, but i'm not going to complain when this is the first truly high resolution user-made video we've seen and with clear in-game sounds on top of that. Off the top of my head, some observations:
There's also noticeable building pop-up but it doesn't bother me for a very simple reason: it seems to be a by-product of a combination of user selectable options. The overall landscape and sky draw distance is much higher than the building one, it's just that setting buildings to lower detail will cause them to render at a closer range. This is very different to what pop-up was in IL2, where it existed even when there was no option to modify draw distances (ie, it occurred even when the draw distances were the same for both landscape and 3d objects) and it's still there today regardless of having options for increased landscape draw distance. Personally, i'd rather have a 20km visibility range to spot aircraft along with the ability to have the building render range at 10km to maintain some FPS, instead of having to fly with a common setting for both which means choosing between either overall reducing draw distance and crippling my situational awareness/landmark identification/navigation or having to use settings that my PC can't handle. In such a case of using long-range landscape rendering with short-range building rendering pop-up is inevitable, but it is still useful to have separate options for those who like to balance looks with functionality, especially when flying full switch online. Most of all, this review gives us a good indication of relative performance and the ability to make an educated guess on how it will run on our systems. Currently, it seems that higher clock speeds and VRAM matter the most. I hope that after a few patches and optimizations we'll be able to better spread the processing load over multiple cores, putting the OS on core1, main game engine on core2 and whatever else it can use on the remaining two. Maybe we can already and it's just a matter of editing the conf.ini to set process affinity, since there is such an option just like it was in IL2, but we'll have to wait for more feedback on this. I do have an i7 920 at stock speed (2.7 GHz) but i don't really want to overclock it since it's the earlier C0 revision that doesn't go that high anyway. Most of all, my PC is on almost 24/7 and i don't want to up my power bills by increasing my system's idle wattage My weak spot might be my 3GB of RAM, but apparently the game doesn't use more than 2GB yet. Maybe i'll get an extra 3GB once we have a 64-bit .exe to make use of it. What i would really like to know is how my Ati 4890 1GB stacks up against some of the current low-end to middle-range DX11 GPUs when both are running DX10. I know for a fact that late generation DX10 GPUs were faster than early DX11 ones when they were both running DX9/10, but i don't know if and how much difference current gen DX11 cards make when running in DX10 mode. In any case, i'm optimistic that since the uploader could maintain 30-40FPS at tree-top level with Fraps running on high settings, i might be able to maintain 30FPS overall on medium detail after the first couple of patches arrive. What do you guys think? P.S. We know the stutters are in for a short-term fix and it seems that a lot of the slow-downs are caused by some kind of faulty loading routine. Many people report missions running better if they quit and refly, or pause and cycle the external cameras once, which seems to be an indication that the game is not loading/pre-caching everything it should before the mission, causing it to access the hard-drive during gameplay more often and slowing down the FPS. I'm not an expert, but it seems possible to fix and coupled with the better looking videos we see each day even from the current version that does have its issues, i'm going to maintain my optimism. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
lol IL-2 music has always been shit, we know that they never cared too much for the looks part of their product.
I have to agree about the oil on the windscreen though, the effect is pretty lame, and the one on Dirt 2 is surely easy to replicate! Come on Maddox Games, make an extra effort!! |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Nice landing too. After the touchdown I found myself shouting "hit the brakes, hit the d@mn BRAKES!!!" |
#50
|
||||
|
||||
Guns sound fantastic, and I'll bet they will be even better directly from the game (rather than a video).
It's good to see it can run well. About the freezes every 5 seconds - they seem to me to appear on some peoples video and not on others, irrespective of settings and hardware. Thanks for posting. Ignore the idiots here.
__________________
All CoD screenshots here: http://s58.photobucket.com/albums/g260/restranger/ __________ Flying online as Setback. |
|
|