Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > Controls threads

Controls threads Everything about controls in CoD

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 02-11-2011, 04:29 AM
julian265 julian265 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 195
Default

Got a link?
__________________
DIY uni-joint / hall effect sensor stick guide:
http://www.mycockpit.org/forums/cont...ake-a-joystick
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 02-11-2011, 04:36 AM
Wolf_Rider Wolf_Rider is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,677
Default

TrackIR interfaceFreeTrack is compatible with the unencrypted version of NaturalPoint's TrackIR head tracking interface that has widespread support in simulation games. NaturalPoint have been using an encrypted version of the interface in more popular titles since late 2008, these can be identified as requiring TrackIR software version 4.1.036 or higher and are incompatible with FreeTrack.[18][19] First used in DCS: Black Shark,[20] it caused developer Eagle Dynamics to release their own head tracking interface but soon after cancelled it at NaturalPoint's request.[21] FreeTrack compatibility is still possible using [TrackIRFixer] to remove the encryption requirement, however this involves file modification which can conflict with some forms of DRM and online anti-cheat. Currently DiRT 2 and F1 2010 are affected by DRM, refusing to run after the fix has been applied.

TIRViews.dll is a dynamic-link library file distributed with TrackIR software that provides tailored support for a small number of mostly older games, using special interfaces or memory hacks to facilitate view control.[22] Though a violation of the TrackIR software's EULA,[23] it is possible to use the file with FreeTrack.

NaturalPoint's TrackIR interface SDK is only available under a signed license agreement[24] and is covered by a NDA, so while FreeTrack is open source, the TrackIR interface component is required to be closed source.[25]


wiki
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 02-11-2011, 04:43 AM
julian265 julian265 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 195
Default

OK, I thought you were saying that the FT software gets info from NP software.

Carry on.
__________________
DIY uni-joint / hall effect sensor stick guide:
http://www.mycockpit.org/forums/cont...ake-a-joystick
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 02-11-2011, 04:45 AM
Wolf_Rider Wolf_Rider is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,677
Default

The NP interface is NP software

your ball I believe
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 02-11-2011, 04:54 AM
julian265 julian265 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 195
Default

You don't need to attack points that I never made. Please leave your straw man at the door.

My post:
"There has been no additions or changes to FT since November 2008 - the FT interface was around before that. Also FT never gets data from TIR."

You disagreed, which logically made me think that you were saying that FT gets data from TIR. If you want to ignore the word "data" or "info" and pretend that I was meaning differently, then you can carry on talking to yourself.

Your quote from wiki is quite valid, but it doesn't affect my views on the matter of head tracking in games.
__________________
DIY uni-joint / hall effect sensor stick guide:
http://www.mycockpit.org/forums/cont...ake-a-joystick
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 02-11-2011, 05:00 AM
Wolf_Rider Wolf_Rider is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,677
Default

dragging the circle around so quick, Julian?

the point addressed was your point; "Also FT never gets data from TIR". I'm sorry but you seemed to be incorrect there. I'm also sorry if you saw that as an attack, it wasn't, it was a correction. You've been shown quite clearly, it used to and in some cases still does.
I'm wondering if Dirt2 and F1 2010 are getting the same treatment ArmA 2 got?
Let's hope UBI get the DRM right on this one...


your ball again...
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 02-11-2011, 05:31 AM
julian265 julian265 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 195
Default

A sim gets joystick position info or data from a joystick.

FT does not get any data from TIR.

Get it?
__________________
DIY uni-joint / hall effect sensor stick guide:
http://www.mycockpit.org/forums/cont...ake-a-joystick
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 02-11-2011, 05:47 AM
Wolf_Rider Wolf_Rider is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,677
Default

perhaps you'd like to try that one again?
and don't be rude

Last edited by Wolf_Rider; 02-11-2011 at 05:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 02-11-2011, 06:08 AM
albx albx is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 716
Default

Why everytime there is a discussion about Freetrack the end is always FT vs. TIR and copyright infringments?? The question here was "will COD support FreeTrack?". So, if NP couldn't shut down freetrack website i think there is no patent infringments and is only speculation...
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 02-11-2011, 06:09 AM
Wolf_Rider Wolf_Rider is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,677
Default

nah... its obvious there is copyright infringement
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.