![]() |
|
IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
View Poll Results: Battle of France as add on? | |||
Yes, will buy this. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
55 | 58.51% |
OK, if for free. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
21 | 22.34% |
No, looking forward to Eastern front. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | 19.15% |
Voters: 94. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#471
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well?
The way I see it? Falstaff is saying? "If you got the time, he's got the beer" Pretty much most of the realists here? Are tired of drinking the Chivas...and milk. So far, it's been fun... ![]() |
#472
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
By the way Bewolf, you know how many times someone has said the same thing is being said over and over again? Thanks for adding in your exceptionally long winded nauseum to the thread and welcome to the "ad-nauseum" party. |
#473
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
In short you are saying that developement continues only because of the whining, thats as cross as a tail wagging the dog. And that you dont seem to understand that any developement for the "sequel" is also a developement for CoD as they are using the same engine is really sad. And finally, the more positive posters were only reacting to the overboarding whining in the beginning, now its a self runner. ![]() Just to have a positive ending. ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects ![]() |
#474
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is a serious side to it, or there could be.
If you can clear all the batlefield smoke and mist out of the way (ridiculous optimism, blind faith, mis-reading the past, Tarot-cards for the future) then you could have a ground-swell of sensible opinion which the devs could actually find useful and instructive, or at least worth taking note of. It may even influence certain priorities and directions. As it is you have a foxhunt with the rosier-cheeked members sat on high horses blowing their trumpets, ta-da, while encouraging the dogs on the ground to go after any fox that dares criticise. And throwing smoke-bombs to obfuscate as much as they can. I particularly enjoy the standard line 'but we know it's broken, we knew all along, you dont need to keep saying'. As far as i can tell it is mostly spoken by those who argued bitterly with any early problem-raising, ignored the defects, assailed anyone who asked for missing features, and generally let a few months go by before quietly sneaking in the odd tacit admission all was not bright and rosy. Then crossed their arms and looked all smug. Hmm. Never mind those who spend 1000s upgrading base don the those 'certain certainties'. This is why the more idiot elements need reigning in, or at least countering. I have no problem with anyone liking the game for what it is. But could be, and will be? Or is that 'should have been'? Ben |
#475
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Agreed. I'd like to see them ban you.
|
#476
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Hayward said:
>>Agreed. I'd like to see them ban you. << You're just an all-round nice guy and good egg aren't you? That may well happen, or I'll probably leave again in any case. You can then insert a smart quip. In my opinion you should have been banned many months ago, for one insidious jibe after another, steadily maintained, with the occasional outburst of really low, dowdy, spiteful obnoxiousness. I could quote, but it would some time to gather all the available evidence. A few days in fact. I have no respect, or even sneaking respect for you, or the people like you. But you are probably aware of that. Good. |
#477
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
There is a vast majority of folks that have simply shelved COD and moved on to other things while quietly waiting for COD to be fixed. If they find out that that $50 bill collecting dust on their shelf is going to cost another $50 to be patched properly, they probably will lose interest completely, and not purchase the sequel. I don't want that to happen. |
#478
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on. |
#479
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Right back at ya!
|
#480
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I also think (hopeful) that 1C sees it the same way. They know that despite the whining, there has been a lot of support too. Even the most ardent whiners are fans who expected something better and are disappointed. Releasing the corrections and features independant of CoD (or even only dovetailed into CoD with purchase of BoM) will lead to an even greater loss of faith in the company. It would be suicide IMO. |
![]() |
|
|