Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #431  
Old 04-01-2011, 04:29 AM
nearmiss nearmiss is offline
Global Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,687
Default

Krt_Bong

I wouldn't worry about the VC at this time. Give the devs and community a chance to start posting configurations and settings.

I have an nvidia 8800 GTS 512MB single card. I remember when I bought it how it was outdated and such, and everyone was pushing SLI.

Addressing all multiple VC wasn't as facilitated well as people were saying. In fact, by having one card I was at better FPS than all the SLI users with few exceptions.

You can see my specs below aren't too different than your own. I have vista 64. I run the IL2 - 4.101 with the Vista and get great performance and graphics.

http://www.nvidia.com/page/geforce_8800.html
Reply With Quote
  #432  
Old 04-01-2011, 04:36 AM
TheGrunch's Avatar
TheGrunch TheGrunch is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 843
Default

That's true, it is better to wait until we know whether the game will continue to hog graphics memory. From what we've seen, though, 512MB and even 1GB of graphics memory is just not enough.
Reply With Quote
  #433  
Old 04-01-2011, 05:41 AM
Krt_Bong Krt_Bong is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sarasota, Florida, USA
Posts: 169
Default

Well I didn't say I won't be buying a new Graphics card, just not yet. I too am taking a wait and see approach, till I have the game installed it's all purely speculative.
Reply With Quote
  #434  
Old 04-01-2011, 07:52 AM
merlin1 merlin1 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 66
Default

I think the game is far ahead of today's hardware capacity. Even before the outcome was clear that the latest hardware barely satisfy the needs for normal flight.

rgr.
__________________
AMD Phenom X4 955 BE 3808 MHz
ROG Crosshair III Formula
PATRIOT G series DDR 3, 4 x 2 GB (8GB) 1600 MHz
Inno3D gtx580 1.5G
Philips 220 CW
Windows 7 Enterprise 64 Bit
Reply With Quote
  #435  
Old 04-01-2011, 09:23 AM
airsheep airsheep is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 9
Default

hi
i have the following system:
i2500k~4ghz, gtx560ti 1gb, 2x2gb 1033 ddr3 rams resolution: 23" 1920x1080
I think this is enough most of the games that was released in the last few weeks/months.
I bought CoD from Steam and I've trying how to set the video options to make it flyable.
As I see the game is flyable (doesn't matter where you are flying, above sea or London, but it need a bit time to load buildings, etc, and above sea it runs a bit fluently)
So I think we need an optimisation patch (core usage, etc) and it will solve most of the problems.
Great work guys, just continue and this will be the best sim ever
(sorry for my english I'm from Hungary, -I hope you understand)
Reply With Quote
  #436  
Old 04-01-2011, 06:38 PM
MaDMaX68 MaDMaX68 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by airsheep View Post
hi
i have the following system:
i2500k~4ghz, gtx560ti 1gb, 2x2gb 1033 ddr3 rams resolution: 23" 1920x1080
I think this is enough most of the games that was released in the last few weeks/months.
I bought CoD from Steam and I've trying how to set the video options to make it flyable.
As I see the game is flyable (doesn't matter where you are flying, above sea or London, but it need a bit time to load buildings, etc, and above sea it runs a bit fluently)
So I think we need an optimisation patch (core usage, etc) and it will solve most of the problems.
Great work guys, just continue and this will be the best sim ever
(sorry for my english I'm from Hungary, -I hope you understand)
Your English is better than my Hungarian ! Lol so ur welcome

My system doesn't not arrive till monday
i7 2600 3.4ghz WC
8GB ddr3 1333mhz ram
Samsung 24" 1920x1080 monitor
ATI 6870

I am excited to c if mine plays CoD well

An given what my system is I won't lose sleep if it does not play well as I think it's been established the game needs patching
Reply With Quote
  #437  
Old 04-02-2011, 08:02 PM
JG14_Jagr JG14_Jagr is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 433
Default



36 He111's and 12 Spitfires..

FRAPS locked the fps at 30 but without FRAPS on its around 40-45 at 1920X1200 Video settings on HIGH, Mirrors OFF, then set roads OFF, grass OFF, forests to VERY LOW, and most importantly. set buildings to lowest detail and number settings.. everything else remains HIGH

Runs great..
__________________
MSI P67A-65D
Intel i5 2500K @ 4.2 Gig
8 Gigs Corsair DDR3 1600 RAM
XFX 6970 Video Card
Win7 64 Bit Home Ed
ATI 12.3 Driver Package
WD Caviar 7600 RPM HDD
ATI CCC at DEFAULT settings
Reply With Quote
  #438  
Old 04-04-2011, 04:43 AM
Krt_Bong Krt_Bong is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sarasota, Florida, USA
Posts: 169
Default

One thing I've looked into when considering a vid card is that it have a 256 bit bus, it makes no sense to buy a card with 2 Gb VRam and have a 128 bit bus and there are plenty at reasonably low prices but I cant see wasting money on them. I would consider a 1 Gb card and 256 if it will run the game a reasonable Med High settings, but I will wait to see what ppl say after the end of April when the optimisation has been made. I don't really want to spend $200 on a vid card but when new stuff comes out the other cards tend to come down a little in price and rebates are more appealing if they bring a cards price down 20-30 bucks. I just want to know what the best specs for some of these middle weight cards should be before spending my money.
Reply With Quote
  #439  
Old 04-04-2011, 03:41 PM
Triggaaar Triggaaar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 535
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Krt_Bong View Post
I will wait to see what ppl say after the end of April when the optimisation has been made.
Just remember, it's not THE optimisation, just the FIRST optimisation.

Quote:
I don't really want to spend $200 on a vid card but when new stuff comes out the other cards tend to come down a little in price and rebates are more appealing if they bring a cards price down 20-30 bucks.
There are some excellent deals on the last generation of cards about, but the next gen aren't due until the end of the year, so I think it'll be a while before prices of the current gen will fall. Like you say, see what results people get with cards like the 470 and 5870 after the patch, as there should be good deals on those cards.
Reply With Quote
  #440  
Old 04-04-2011, 06:55 PM
Gallandwolf Gallandwolf is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 12
Default

My system presently is old faitful Quad 6600, Geforce GTX 460, 4gb Ram, Windows 7 and SSD harddrive which in my opinion gives the final boost that enables me to play the latest games quite well.

CoD is the only one I've tried where I notice that a faster system would be better, but I hope in the future patches will optimize the game and make it faster.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.