Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik > Daidalos Team discussions

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #401  
Old 01-02-2011, 10:02 AM
elkaskone elkaskone is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2
Default

@Letum

2,8-3G means nothing in the Game,
if this will be not fixed you are unable to make good defensive figures at medium speeds!
Other flyable Bombers can all pull more G than the 111H2 and it looks uneven in my eyes!
If 2,8-3G for he111h2 is realistic number, than i think many other planes need a negative fix!
  #402  
Old 01-02-2011, 10:42 AM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

I have found some data for the He111 here :
http://www.bredow-web.de/Sinsheim-Sp..._111_h-16.html
there one can read :

Safe load factor in recovering in relation to the aircraft center of gravity:

2,9 g at 11,6 tons
3,1 g at 11,0 tons
3,4 g at 10,0 tons
3,6 g at 9,5 tons

If thats the safe figures the damage should occur at much higher g-loads.
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
  #403  
Old 01-02-2011, 11:09 AM
Ian Boys Ian Boys is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 81
Default

Av, can you get AI planes to despawn in MDS? I can't.
  #404  
Old 01-02-2011, 11:13 AM
JtD JtD is offline
Il-2 enthusiast & Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 903
Default

Empty TO weight H-2 in game: ~12 tons.
TO weight H-2 with 8x250kg bombs: ~14 tons
Safe g-limit when applying RL data: ~2.8g / 2.4g against structural damage
Safety factor in Germany at that time: 1.5 to complete failure.
Instant failure for in game weights: 4.2 g / 3.6 g

Summary: He 111H-2 failing at about 3 g -> ok.
  #405  
Old 01-02-2011, 11:13 AM
JtD JtD is offline
Il-2 enthusiast & Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 903
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian Boys View Post
Av, can you get AI planes to despawn in MDS? I can't.
Always despawn for me, and I didn't do anything magic. Just checked the appropriate box.
  #406  
Old 01-02-2011, 11:51 AM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JtD View Post
Empty TO weight H-2 in game: ~12 tons.
TO weight H-2 with 8x250kg bombs: ~14 tons
Safe g-limit when applying RL data: ~2.8g / 2.4g against structural damage
Safety factor in Germany at that time: 1.5 to complete failure.
Instant failure for in game weights: 4.2 g / 3.6 g

Summary: He 111H-2 failing at about 3 g -> ok.
If 20% difference is ok for you????
Fully loaded with 100% fuel it should share its wings, or else, at 3.6 g, not 3.
And sincerly, fully loaded with 100% fuel we have only at the start.
Do ALL bombers have their limits below the real data or only some??
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
  #407  
Old 01-02-2011, 12:10 PM
JtD JtD is offline
Il-2 enthusiast & Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 903
Default

No, there should be chance of it shedding wings eventually from 2.8 g onwards. They should certainly fail at 4.2g (empty, 100%).
  #408  
Old 01-02-2011, 12:32 PM
koivis koivis is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 53
Default

I tested all the He 111 variants and found some interesting results:

He 111 H-2, empty, 10% fuel: 2,8/4,2
He 111 H-2, 8xSC250, 100% fuel: 1,9/2,8 (<- is this the ~3G you got?)

He 111 H-6, empty, 10% fuel: 5,1/7,6
He 111 H-6, 1xSC2000, 100% fuel: 3,3/5,0

He 111 H-12, 1xFritz-X, 100% fuel: 3,5/5,2

It seems that H-2 and H-6&12 have totally different G-limits. H-2 is indeed more fragile than the link posted by robtek suggest, but then that data is for H-16. H-6, on the other hand, is amazingly durable. In empty loadout and with low fuel, I managed to get the wings off at over 6G, and even that needed some "softening" first. I'm thinking that both could be wrong, but any plane modelled with too low G-limits is not good for the game.

EDIT: the way to test these is very simple. Turn on the no-cockpit HUD view, dive, pull up slowly. When the G-number display turns red, you are within 25% of the service limit. Service limit = red number / 0,75; break limit = service limit x 1,5.
__________________
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Redguys Air Racing Team
Member A4
www.simairracing.com

"The fastest pilots of the online world..."

Last edited by koivis; 01-02-2011 at 12:36 PM.
  #409  
Old 01-02-2011, 12:52 PM
322Sqn_Dusty's Avatar
322Sqn_Dusty 322Sqn_Dusty is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 214
Default

Maybe it's possible for me to ask a couple of veterans from 322Squadron how they trimmed the various Spitfre types and how the ladies behaved.

Some of the veterans I spoke with a couple of years ago I asked how she flew... they all gave the same answer more or less.. 'she flies as she looks'

*ot* great pictures ivank. Got more?
  #410  
Old 01-02-2011, 01:47 PM
vparez's Avatar
vparez vparez is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 26
Default

Hi TD,

got a graphics bug: in the early spitfire MkIXc, with the rounded vertical tail, the last LOD that casts shadows, is missing the shadow for left wing mid(?) section.

Cheers!

Last edited by vparez; 01-02-2011 at 01:49 PM.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.