Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 06-14-2011, 07:42 PM
Rattlehead Rattlehead is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 727
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jctrnacty View Post
I would call it:

calm before storm.
Probably.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 06-14-2011, 08:21 PM
Robert's Avatar
Robert Robert is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 717
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK View Post
Well I hope its not true Robert, I admit that, but I honestly think that Luthier is playing a dangerous game by not communicating more frequently with us, either him or one of his team. If the dev's are going to continue to support this game when all the cash as been counted like they said they would, then you would expect them to be bending over backwards to keep us up to date after releasing a product in such a poor state, especially if they wish to release future add on's, and more importantly win back some respect and trust.

I don't understand why bending over backwards to keep us up to date would benefit anyone when a map has been laid out, Tree. Sure, I'm curious. Yes I'd like to know. But do I NEED to know?

The team has made 3 (?) patches so far, and if memory serves me they made a road map for each one. What vital information would you glean from a weekly post when progress is going as carefully as it is? What emotional fulfillment would any of us get if Luthier would come in and report that we're 40% complete. Things are going as well as expected.

He could say we've knocked out the SLI issue at the 40% mark. Then what if something else being worked on after that 40% update interferes with THAT progress and they're back at square one. Who benefits?

I think they have every good intention of doing Friday updates, but when there isn't a plethora of information to report weekly, why should they be required ti make a report? The bi-weekly report suffices for me when they've displayed they progress map.


Looking at it like I do, I can't see why it's such a dangerous game when Luthier can't make an un-promised schedule.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.