Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik

IL-2 Sturmovik The famous combat flight simulator.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 10-09-2007, 10:17 AM
tagTaken2's Avatar
tagTaken2 tagTaken2 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 207
Default

It was just a thought from before 1946... some of the preview screens looked 3d, such as Ta-183, and I thought there would be a few planes for offliners to enjoy with 6dof.

Pretty late now though, may as well wait for BoB.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-09-2007, 11:20 AM
1.JaVA_Sharp 1.JaVA_Sharp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Maastricht the Netherlands
Posts: 311
Default

the biggest beef(s)

1:AI
2:sound
3: lack of immersion.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-09-2007, 12:12 PM
DerAlte DerAlte is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Good Old Germany
Posts: 47
Default

1. AI
2. Default markings
3. Lack of flyable Avenger, Hawk 75 (official I mean) and a few other planes
4. A campaign that if I fail, I can lose the war, regardless of which side I fly for

Other than the above mentioned. The game has given me years of pleasure ever since the first IL-2 demo.



DerAlte
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10-09-2007, 12:40 PM
Bearcat Bearcat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Northern Va. by way of Da Bronx
Posts: 992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1.JaVA_Sharp
the biggest beef(s)

1:AI
2:sound
3: lack of immersion.
I actually believe that with the improved AI in BoB & Sound.. (I realize that some of this stuff that we are hoping for in here just may never materialize simply because the engine is so long in the tooth... ) a lot of that will be addressed but for IL2.... 1 & 2 will address 3 dont you think? I have found that VAC greatly enhances immersion offline .. at least for me, and even though they sometimes just sit there and watch me burn..LOL.. it is nicve to be able to actually talk to your AI.... The first time my friends saw me do that when they came to visit.. (My dad was in th baseent with me.. and he heard me talk to the AI and heard therm respond.. and was amazed) they were blown away.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 10-09-2007, 04:30 PM
mungee's Avatar
mungee mungee is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Durban, South Africa
Posts: 146
Default

I often have great difficulty in catching up to my flight after take-off.

Otherwise a great sim that has given me many hundreds of hours of enjoyment - thanks Oleg and your team.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 10-09-2007, 05:17 PM
mrsiCkstar mrsiCkstar is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 12
Default

I would love for the next sim to have a single player component as strong as Falcon 4: Allied Force. Infact, just steal the whole campaign system from that sim because it can be played online as well. It would be heaven for me.

Apart from that I don't really have many gripes. Better sounds would be cool.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 10-09-2007, 05:43 PM
kristorf's Avatar
kristorf kristorf is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Milton Keynes, England
Posts: 897
Default

Biggest gripe has to be the laser gunners in aircraft, amazes me with the ability to shoot through thier own aircraft.
Also the 'one shot' kills of the said gunners and AI A/C.
__________________
Regards

Chris



http://www.aircombatgroup.co.uk/index.php





Gigabyte z77-d3h, Intel Core i5-3570K 3.40GHz (OC 4.2GHz), Corsair Vengeance Low Profile 24GB DDR3 PC3-12800C9 1600MHz Dual Channel Kit , Samsung 120GB SSD 840 SATA 6Gb/s Basic, Seagate Barracuda 7200RPM 1TB SATA 6Gb/s 64MB, Cooling Silencer Mk II 750W '80 Plus Silver' PSU,
GTX580 3gb OC
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 10-09-2007, 05:47 PM
ucanfly ucanfly is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3
Default

Poor visibility of ground objects and planes (worse than reality). This is probably common to all flight sims, but I wish there would be some compensation for this other than the immersion killing icons. On a related note the monocular camera lens view of the cockpit is also worse than reality. TrackIR 6DOF would have compensated for this, but thinner canopy frames and a realistically pivoting rear view could do this as well without going to that expense.

Hope these issues are addressed in subsequent work (I know 6DOF iis planned n BOB SOW).

Oh and sounds! More realistic sound samples would have been nice.

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 10-09-2007, 05:56 PM
Foo'bar Foo'bar is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Niedersachsen, Deutschland
Posts: 662
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ucanfly
Oh and sounds! More realistic sound samples would have been nice.
err... you know what..?
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 10-09-2007, 05:59 PM
Seeker Seeker is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 213
Default

1) No way of generating campaigns for a signigicant proportion of the plane set. Any one know how to get a buff escort dynamic campaign for the P 38?

2) No way to join a co-op game in progress.

3) Funky keyboard trim.

4) Rewind on tracks.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.