Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover
Reload this Page Preview flight simulator "IL-2 Sturmovik: The Battle of Britain
Register FAQ Calendar

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
Page 4 of 5 « First 23 4 5
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 02-24-2011, 10:03 PM
Kikuchiyo Kikuchiyo is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 256
Default
Not sure if it has already been addressed here, but what would be the point of having your Vertical convergence being set for closer/farther than your Horizontal convergence?
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 02-25-2011, 03:23 AM
White Owl White Owl is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 225
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kikuchiyo View Post
Not sure if it has already been addressed here, but what would be the point of having your Vertical convergence being set for closer/farther than your Horizontal convergence?
I'll speculate wildly here.

We know "physical weathering" is for modeling the deterioration of various mechanical systems in the airplane. I speculate that the guns and their mountings can wear out so they no longer shoot in exactly the correct spot, and the individual convergence options are used to correct each individual gun's alignment.

Maybe I'm totally wrong, though.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-25-2011, 04:39 AM
machoo
Guest
  
Posts: n/a
Default
разумеется. "крылатые хищники" делала совсем другая команда, и проект был заведомо аркадный. !!!!!!111!!!
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 02-25-2011, 04:54 AM
White Owl White Owl is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 225
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by machoo View Post
разумеется. "крылатые хищники" делала совсем другая команда, и проект был заведомо аркадный. !!!!!!111!!!
Easy for you to say.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 02-25-2011, 10:16 AM
klem's Avatar
klem klem is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,653
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stiboo View Post
................
and nice to see what Oleg's modern civilian flightsim will look like !!
Oleg's Modern Flight Sim? Really? Any details?
__________________
klem
56 Squadron RAF "Firebirds"
http://firebirds.2ndtaf.org.uk/



ASUS Sabertooth X58 /i7 950 @ 4GHz / 6Gb DDR3 1600 CAS8 / EVGA GTX570 GPU 1.28Gb superclocked / Crucial 128Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s, 355Mb-215Mb Read-Write / 850W PSU
Windows 7 64 bit Home Premium / Samsung 22" 226BW @ 1680 x 1050 / TrackIR4 with TrackIR5 software / Saitek X52 Pro & Rudders
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 02-25-2011, 11:47 AM
Stiboo Stiboo is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Torquay UK
Posts: 145
Default
Because we have a modern acrobatic aircraft included with COD!

Oleg is preparing us for a future modern version of his flightsim engine.
Why else include this plane which has nothing at all to do with the Battle Of Britain?

Can't think of any other reason for the bizarre inclusion of this plane, other than testing the waters for the future?

But I am happy to have an extra plane for nothing in COD considering the time and effort it takes to make one.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 02-25-2011, 12:21 PM
adonys adonys is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 850
Default
it for acrobatic flights maneuvers & training.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 02-25-2011, 12:37 PM
Immermann Immermann is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 38
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stiboo View Post
Because we have a modern acrobatic aircraft included with COD!

Oleg is preparing us for a future modern version of his flightsim engine.
Why else include this plane which has nothing at all to do with the Battle Of Britain?

Can't think of any other reason for the bizarre inclusion of this plane, other than testing the waters for the future?

But I am happy to have an extra plane for nothing in COD considering the time and effort it takes to make one.
Nice whine.

It's for testing the flight model to a verifiable reference.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 02-25-2011, 02:21 PM
Stiboo Stiboo is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Torquay UK
Posts: 145
Default
Time will tell all !

If it's only for testing data then why make cockpit and skin it?

Only 1 model of the Bf109E included in the sim... But we have huge amount of time devoted to a modern plane...
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 02-25-2011, 03:54 PM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default
Because when it is tested by aerobatic pilots they will also fly a simulation and not a rc-plane!
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 4 of 5 « First 23 4 5

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:04 PM.


Contact Us - Fulqrum Publishing s.r.o. - Archive - Top
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.