Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey

IL-2 Sturmovik: Birds of Prey Famous title comes to consoles.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 12-01-2009, 12:57 AM
kozzm0 kozzm0 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: летая через небо
Posts: 514
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by winny View Post
Otklanyayemi Vektor Tyagi, It's what we call deflection thrust vectoring

Go (didn't quote the video) to see it in action At 5mins 40 is it does super cobra which is very impressive.
They've pretty much changed the translation to "orbital vectored thrust" lately.
The engine nozzles can be rotated independently to 15 degrees on each side, up-down, top-bottom, allowing crazy angle of attack and moves that make the old cobra look pedestrian.

I'm not sure if the mig ovt does this, but su-35 can also independently regulate the thrust of each engine, which allows it to keep the thrust outside the center of mass on turns and get crazy rotation power. It can do cobras that end in double backflips and do flat spins that barely lose altitude. It can also end tailslides sideways and has its own combat maneuver called "cobra roll" that uses the engine differential.

Why is ovt a good counter to stealth, because it stakes out the low-speed visual range combat, whereas stealth is based on higher-speed and beyond-visual range. The f-22 and f-35 are good fighters, but against the sukhois they would have to use high-speed tactics because they can't corner as well at low speed. That positions the stealth planes as more offensive, and the sukhois as more defensive, though they are still pretty fast.

Last edited by kozzm0; 12-01-2009 at 01:02 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-01-2009, 01:21 AM
Robotic Pope's Avatar
Robotic Pope Robotic Pope is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hertfordshire,England,UK
Posts: 1,520
Default

Yeah the Mig29ovt can also move both nozels independantly.
See at 1:45. They move so life like, kind of scary.

__________________


XBL GT: - Robotic Pope
HyperLobby CS: - Robot_Pope
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-01-2009, 06:50 AM
flynlion flynlion is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 288
Default

Pretty cool. Has a MiG 29 ever won in air to air combat?
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12-01-2009, 09:55 AM
Riceball Riceball is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Iowa City, IA. USA
Posts: 306
Default



Watch at 1:25 & 2:35, The F-22 is just as impressive as anything else.

And both nozzles move independantly on this machine as well.

Edit: Now that I've read the entire thread, my post is a bit out of context. Also, it's funny that that Su-29 is red, white and blue.

Last edited by Riceball; 12-01-2009 at 10:06 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 12-01-2009, 11:19 AM
Shadowcorp Shadowcorp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SOMEWHERE
Posts: 286
Default

i'd have to go with a sukhoi over a f22.
Steath technology with the advent of the anti stealth radar employed by the eurofighter and rafale is not all it's cracked up to be.
Plus haven't there been cases of f22 just losing all their electrics and dropping like rocks..... didn't something like that happen last year (i may be wrong).
And the fact you could have something like four sukhois to every one f22 in money terms
( did they ever make the su37 or was that just HAWX decieving me?)
Plus i like the idea of not having to store it in a temparature controlled hangar lol

Last edited by Shadowcorp; 12-01-2009 at 11:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 12-01-2009, 11:22 AM
InfiniteStates InfiniteStates is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 707
Default

I can see clearly that stealth is a one trick pony - but it "should" let you take the initiative. But can a plane not have both? Or is a stealth shape too unstable for OVT too?
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 12-01-2009, 11:28 AM
Shadowcorp Shadowcorp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SOMEWHERE
Posts: 286
Default oh yeah

sad but flight in it's space or terestrial form has intrigued me since star wars
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 12-01-2009, 12:35 PM
Lexandro Lexandro is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Ankh-Morpork
Posts: 339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by InfiniteStates View Post
I can see clearly that stealth is a one trick pony - but it "should" let you take the initiative. But can a plane not have both? Or is a stealth shape too unstable for OVT too?
Its expense that stop both on a single airframe. OVT can be used with stealth designs, its just extremely expensive to have both. The F22 when it was in pre-development (IE drawing board) was intended to have full 360 degree thrust vectoring but the sheer cost of development and contruction meant that they have to reduce the vectoring ability.

And a "cobra" manouvere is old hat now, its the "mongoose" thats the killer move. Check out some video's of the old X-31 program that was the test bed for full thrust vectoring. Its mind blowing stuff,

Last edited by Lexandro; 12-01-2009 at 12:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 12-01-2009, 01:31 PM
InfiniteStates InfiniteStates is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 707
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lexandro View Post
Its expense that stop both on a single airframe. OVT can be used with stealth designs, its just extremely expensive to have both. The F22 when it was in pre-development (IE drawing board) was intended to have full 360 degree thrust vectoring but the sheer cost of development and contruction meant that they have to reduce the vectoring ability.
That's OK - the American tax payer has deep pockets
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 12-01-2009, 07:22 PM
kozzm0 kozzm0 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: летая через небо
Posts: 514
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by InfiniteStates View Post
That's OK - the American tax payer has deep pockets
Not this American taxpayer. It's not too late to modify the f-35 with ovt and remove the vtol.

Su-37 was a testbed, it was never intended for production. There were only 1 or 2 ever made. Same with su-47. That didn't stop Ace Combat and Hawx from having whole squadrons of them though. When I played the Hawx demo, and at the end saw 4 su-47's attacking me, I knew it was Ace Combat 7, except you couldn't use cockpit view.

PAK-FA is supposedly going to have both ovt and stealth. No doubt they'll put ovt on it, or all that testing was for nothing. But the Russian government is also putting heavy pressure on them to make a stealth plane. That's probably why it's so far behind schedule. They were supposed to roll out this year, now they say early next year.

Last edited by kozzm0; 12-01-2009 at 07:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.