Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

View Poll Results: When will the next beta patch be released?
thursday!!! 1 0.74%
this friday 18 13.24%
during next week 15 11.03%
during the week after the next week 12 8.82%
in three weeks 9 6.62%
after a month 12 8.82%
two months 2 1.47%
three months 5 3.68%
this year, hopefully.. 20 14.71%
in two weeks 42 30.88%
Voters: 136. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #321  
Old 11-10-2011, 06:02 PM
Icebear Icebear is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Antarctica
Posts: 156
Default

As for the DX11 discussion I found the following "technical" interview with Oleg Maddon on German PC Games Hardware (sorry for google translation!)

Quote:
PCGH: What are the graphical highlights of the game? Uses its advanced rendering techniques such as DX11 (shader model 5) FP16 HDR deferred rendering, SSAO or post effects like Tone-mapping, motion blur and depth, etc.?

Oleg Maddox: DX11 is not yet supported in release, yet it is planned to be exploited in future add-on or sequel. In the game engine are many modere (Next Gen) technologies such as FP16 HDR, Deferred Rendering, Screen Space Ambient Occlusion and tone mapping are used. Another special feature is the almost unlimited visibility of more than 1,000 kilometers [note: probably a typo and it's meant 100 km] in clear weather. This is a complex of clouds and weather systems and real-time cloud shadows. Furthermore, there are SFX-shadow, realistic lighting and a 24-hour atmosphere simulation in all altitudes. In addition, the vast game engine supports areas with incredibly detailed landscapes, cities and airports.

Again on DX11. We have a lot of experimenting with the interface and found that the API is still relatively unstable worked. This could be due to the fact that we "cram" more than others did in DX11 games developers. We sometimes had the feeling to push at the other end to a wall and to matters dealt with us that were not ours. Therefore, we set aside the DX11 support, but it's still there, as I write this (note: the interview was conducted in writing). Fans of the series know that we continuously improve our simulations with free add-ons and sequels paid and they can remain confident that we carry the latest technology, accounting, and thus continue to adapt and improve our engine. The basic technology has in fact developed with scalability in mind.

PCGH: Although the sales launch DX11 still not available, you have indeed extended the rendering engine with support for DX10/DX11. How did you proceed?

Oleg Maddox: When programming the engine for Cliffs of Dover, we have no parts of the older IL-2 engine used again. The old engine was still based on Java and C + + code, the new version in C # and C + + programming. It supports OpenGL and DirectX 9 were initially, but OpenGL abandoned and replaced by DX10/DX11. From now on we use almost anything in DX10 and DX10.1 feature on our list and also have a DX11 code in beta, and unfortunately, it is unlikely that may be finalized until the release.
  #322  
Old 11-10-2011, 06:04 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robtek View Post
Btw, have you seen how many claims were proved in this thread?
Just one..

Dynamic Weather..

From a interview with Oleg back in 2009.. And as someone pointed out, 1C stated before the release of CoD (some 2 years later 2011) dynamic weather was not going to be in the inital release.. So, even that 'one' does not really belong on the list. Speaks volumes IMHO about those who would have us belive there is a hudge landry list of 'things' we were promised and did not recive.
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #323  
Old 11-10-2011, 06:05 PM
Tree_UK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

So there you have it, it does not work.
  #324  
Old 11-10-2011, 06:15 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tree_UK View Post
So there you have it, it does not work.
Sorry, hard to keep up with your flip-flops..

So, first you said it does not work
Next you edited your post and said it does work
Next you said it does not work
Next you said it does work
Now your back to saying it does not work

Wheuuu.. again sorry, hard to keep up with all those changes in less than 20min.. Think Ill wait a few more min to see where you end up on this issue.. Kind of entertaining watching you flip flop!
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
  #325  
Old 11-10-2011, 06:18 PM
Icebear Icebear is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Antarctica
Posts: 156
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE-OF-ACES View Post
Sorry, hard to keep up with your flip-flops..

So, first you said it does not work
Next you edited your post and said it does work
Next you said it does not work
Next you said it does work
Now your back to saying it does not work

Wheuuu.. again sorry, hard to keep up with all those changes in less than 20min.. Think Ill wait a few more min to see where you end up on this issue.. Kind of entertaining watching you flip flop!
  #326  
Old 11-10-2011, 06:26 PM
robtek's Avatar
robtek robtek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,819
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Icebear View Post
Nobody wanted to know what you look like
__________________
Win 7/64 Ult.; Phenom II X6 1100T; ASUS Crosshair IV; 16 GB DDR3/1600 Corsair; ASUS EAH6950/2GB; Logitech G940 & the usual suspects
  #327  
Old 11-10-2011, 06:36 PM
ingsoc84 ingsoc84 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 112
Default Flight engine?

Hello..was just curious..are we expecting/getting still a patch that will completely rework the flight engine...or is what we have what we have? thanks..
  #328  
Old 11-10-2011, 06:49 PM
snwkill snwkill is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 94
Default

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=27146

See point #1

Just for further clarification... This is the "What to expect next thread" from Luthier himself.
  #329  
Old 11-10-2011, 06:50 PM
katdogfizzow katdogfizzow is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 297
Default

I would check any number of the dozen or so threads on this topic including the one from yesterday or you could even check the latest stickied update thread by the developer and you should find your answer. Or just randomly click any thread in this forum and someone will be discussing it
  #330  
Old 11-10-2011, 07:34 PM
addman's Avatar
addman addman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vasa, Finland
Posts: 1,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by robtek View Post
Nobody wanted to know what you look like
lol
__________________
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.