Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Pilot's Lounge

Pilot's Lounge Members meetup

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-16-2012, 09:32 PM
TheEditor TheEditor is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElAurens View Post
Older and beaten down by life?


Stereotype much?




The only reason I have any opinion on the subject is that, IMHO, drug enforcement is a colossal waste of money and resources, and it has only lead to the militarization of civilian law enforcement.

As to usage and the lifestyle of it, I couldn't care less about it anymore.

A good single malt scotch is far more satisfying, and it won't hurt your lungs.
Fair enough, we agree on the "colossal waste of money and resources" part. Its cool that you "couldn't care less about it anymore" but at least you have that freedom to choose that liver eatting malt scotch over the (yet to be proven) lung destroying weed.

See friendly debates. Now only if a certain sim had that....
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-21-2012, 09:10 PM
tk471138 tk471138 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElAurens View Post
Older and beaten down by life?


Stereotype much?




The only reason I have any opinion on the subject is that, IMHO, drug enforcement is a colossal waste of money and resources, and it has only lead to the militarization of civilian law enforcement.

As to usage and the lifestyle of it, I couldn't care less about it anymore.

A good single malt scotch is far more satisfying, and it won't hurt your lungs.
hypocrisy much?? alcohol which is toxic and harmful to your cells reaches EVERY part of your body once its in the bloodstream....

THC is not toxic

....any time someone combusts plant material it will produce things that might not be good for ones lungs....however the risks of smoking most american cigarettes has given smoking (anything) a bad reputation...when the majority of the risk from smoking comes from the additives that companies add to the tobacco in the cigarettes (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of..._in_cigarettes) you wont hear this from any of those anti tobacco people...who clearly have no common sense cuz if they did they would realize that these industrial solvents and stuff that we use in cleaning products is the OBVIOUS cause of much of the harm of tobacco...

also apparently when this video hemp for victory was rediscovered the govt and those responsible for it denied that it was ever an official video...public officials denied that this was a real video (after all must maintain the lies about drugs to the public) it wasnt untill activists went to the governments own records and had to prove what was already known, all because some idiots in govt wanted to maintain the status quo....but this is the caring govt that so many idiots love to defend, even though this same govt obviously holds us all in contempt and has zero respect for its people since they think we are all idiots who believe their constant and obvious lies (you know the same people that those in govt are beholden to, thats why they are called "public servants")


just about EVERYTHING regarding the war on drugs (not just cannabis) is based on lies and deception and racism...this is common knowledge...just look at what children are taught about drugs by their local police, mostly lies and gross exaggerations...but it seems too many americans want to be good little slaves and believe the obvious lies that some "authority" spreads some of the first prohibition laws (and gun laws) were for american indians blacks mexicans and asians

after all they sold the drug prohibition by saying stuff like "the negro, crazed on cannabis (cocaine opium what ever) will rape your white daughters'...this is the rallying cry of the prohibitionists

also drug prohibition is unconstitutional...remember alcohol prohibitions required a constitutional amendment to be legal....this constitutional amendment has long since been repealed...thus for drug prohibition to be legal the states would have to make a constitutional amendment making it legal....

the public has no obligation to follow an unconstitutional law and any law that goes against the rights of the people aught to be fought against and ignored...and when the police enforce an unconstitutional law, they must be resisted....remember as an american its LEGAL to use violence in defense of your creator endowed rights...


a funny story...in one of my criminology classes i tried to explain to a professor that hemp is essentially inert cannabis, and that consuming it would be mostly pointless, since the % of psychoactive components is so low which is why its used for its fiber and oils and generally not consumed...of course like most idiot college professors who have no first hand knowledge, denied this claim....according to the "experts" (you know the idiots who write scholarly papers that influence policy) in the criminal justice field hemp is just as bad as cannabis...also the head of the DEA has gone on record saying that cannabis is no more or less harmful than drugs like heroin...according to the dea cocaine (schedule 2) is SAFER than cannabis (schedule 1)


tldr version...the us govt (and basically any govt on this planet) does nothing but lie and mislead the public in order to manipulate their perception (in this case their perception of drugs and the rights of individuals) often times they make stuff illegal to increase their own profits (govts are involved in drug dealing, this is old news congressional investigations have proven this numerous times) private bankers love drug prohibition cuz of the money that needs to be moved (through their banks)
drug prohibition (war on drugs) is unconstitutional for numerous reasons

drug prohibition also relied on racism and oppressing the different groups of immigrants,

the same can be said with laws that infringe on the second amendment rights of the people, laws limiting the second amendment was also started on american Indians and other groups...thats how you know these laws are here simply to oppress the rights of the people...NOT for the health and other concerns the liars in govt claim....

remember when the govt wants to infringe on the rights of the people they do so on unpopular groups for two reasons, 1 to test how they will carry out such activity (a test ground if you will) and 2 in order to acclimate the public for what is to come down the road....

pretty soon the idea of prohibition will be extended to anything the govt deems "harmful to health" the idea of limiting or prohibiting of certain foods will not be so foreign since the precedent has been set through the prohibition of drugs cuz they are harmful....

Last edited by tk471138; 11-21-2012 at 11:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-21-2012, 11:28 PM
Richie's Avatar
Richie Richie is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,450
Default

I'm pretty sure it would have even been legal here by now but we have this bone head as Prime Minister who doesn't want to offend anybody




!

Last edited by Richie; 11-21-2012 at 11:37 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.