Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover

IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 08-04-2012, 11:31 PM
Devastat Devastat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 154
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flyingblind View Post
Nobody is saying the game is finished. It will always be WIP just like the original IL2. This is just a good step towards sorting out the major issues that stopped many from getting acceptable performance and is still a beta. I am sure there is plenty more to come from the developers.
Has the enemy AI improved? Will the enemy hunt me down on single mission dogfights? In previous versions they just used to fly away.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-04-2012, 11:32 PM
Dano Dano is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Petersfield UK
Posts: 1,107
Default

Right, here we go so you can quit moaning about memory...

A simple quick mission with the ROTOL Hurricane at Tangmere, CEM off so I can get it rolling fast, view was swapped out to F8 and left at default level of zoom which enables a nice big cloud of dust to be kicked up and prove my point.

Left hand set of arrows, GFX options set to 1680x1050, everything maxed apart from SSAO and Epilepsy Fliter, you can clearly see that memory useage is held just under my cards available memory, the big dip in fps is when the dust kicks up properly and you can also see there is no significant change in memory useage even though there is still memory available.

Right hand set of arrows is the same senario, only I've dropped to lowest resolution available and turned everything to minimum apart from effects, again, no significant increase in memory useage even though I still have some 500mb+ free but a significant 50% drop in fps when the dust kicks up.

It is clearly a render issue and not memory related.



And even more compelling, fps up above 400 with vsync turned off with everything except effects set to lowest, you can clearly see the major impact the take off dust has to performance with no regard to memory useage.



Obviously it could always be an issue with my drivers or driver setup but I cannot get onboard with it being a memory issue whatsoever.
__________________
i5 2500k - Asus P8P67Pro - Crucial M4 64GB - 8GB DDR3 - Geforce Ti 560 1GB - Xonar DG - W7 X64 SP1

Last edited by Dano; 08-04-2012 at 11:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-05-2012, 12:20 AM
SQB SQB is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 281
Default

Dano, this... I... wow. That's pretty compelling evidence!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-05-2012, 12:56 AM
Skoshi Tiger Skoshi Tiger is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dano View Post
Right, here we go so you can quit moaning about memory...

A simple quick mission with the ROTOL Hurricane at Tangmere, CEM off so I can get it rolling fast, view was swapped out to F8 and left at default level of zoom which enables a nice big cloud of dust to be kicked up and prove my point.

Left hand set of arrows, GFX options set to 1680x1050, everything maxed apart from SSAO and Epilepsy Fliter, you can clearly see that memory useage is held just under my cards available memory, the big dip in fps is when the dust kicks up properly and you can also see there is no significant change in memory useage even though there is still memory available.

Right hand set of arrows is the same senario, only I've dropped to lowest resolution available and turned everything to minimum apart from effects, again, no significant increase in memory useage even though I still have some 500mb+ free but a significant 50% drop in fps when the dust kicks up.

It is clearly a render issue and not memory related.

And even more compelling, fps up above 400 with vsync turned off with everything except effects set to lowest, you can clearly see the major impact the take off dust has to performance with no regard to memory useage.

Obviously it could always be an issue with my drivers or driver setup but I cannot get onboard with it being a memory issue whatsoever.
So how do you reconcile your results with the data on the following link?

Maybe you should post your data there and discusss. It's unusual that both of you have such different results.
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=33540
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-05-2012, 05:28 AM
Flanker35M Flanker35M is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,806
Default

S!

Quick and dirty solution to dust, devs should just reduce the amount or get rid of it. No-one will miss it as it just eats away your FPS.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-05-2012, 06:04 AM
priller26 priller26 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 266
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dano View Post
You're not alone there.
Wow..was hoping that would have been fixed in the particle effects...ohh well.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-05-2012, 08:45 AM
Dano Dano is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Petersfield UK
Posts: 1,107
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skoshi Tiger View Post
So how do you reconcile your results with the data on the following link?

Maybe you should post your data there and discusss. It's unusual that both of you have such different results.
http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=33540
Testing different things is why, he tested memory usage and having not run into any issues with limited memory I was not, I have merely tested to prove that the severe fps slowdown with dust at take off is NOT memory related to make people quit whining about me needing more memory to solve it. I may need a different card, I may need different drivers, I may need a different driver setup but I can say for certain that I do not need more memory to solve the issue.
__________________
i5 2500k - Asus P8P67Pro - Crucial M4 64GB - 8GB DDR3 - Geforce Ti 560 1GB - Xonar DG - W7 X64 SP1
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-05-2012, 10:16 AM
Tavingon Tavingon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Stratford on Avon, England
Posts: 708
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flanker35M View Post
S!

Quick and dirty solution to dust, devs should just reduce the amount or get rid of it. No-one will miss it as it just eats away your FPS.
I agree 100%, there should be a dust quantity in graphics settings or something, some of us want good effects but couldn't care less about dust
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 08-05-2012, 01:39 PM
addman's Avatar
addman addman is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Vasa, Finland
Posts: 1,593
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tavingon View Post
I agree 100%, there should be a dust quantity in graphics settings or something, some of us want good effects but couldn't care less about dust
That's a good idea actually, a "particle effects" settings option.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 08-05-2012, 02:49 PM
flyingblind flyingblind is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 255
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Devastat View Post
Has the enemy AI improved? Will the enemy hunt me down on single mission dogfights? In previous versions they just used to fly away.
I don't think AI behavior has been changed and it is something people have been asking for. There have been posts setting out how AI can be greatly improved by changing stock settings. But I remember when I first started playing Forgotten Battles how unnerving it was when the enemy icons on the map would all begin converging on me from every side.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.