could relativity proof have been falsified?

[raaaid]

the inflating model is equivalent to shriniking space

if light is instant it shouldnt bend by gravity

if it has a speed limit it will appear as a curve in the shrinking space

but again could be einsteing proof have been light bending by the sun refraction caused by its atmosphere?

[5./JG27.Farber]

Originally Posted by raaaid

i have no friends in facebook or twiter

should i buy the book how to make friends to that dirty bald headed fatt dumbaes

No dont buy the book... Its by retards for retards. Your crazy, you need a different book

I dislike facebook and that other one you said...

[SEE]

If 'Black Hole' theory is correct then light is subjected to gravity.

[raaaid]

yes the problem is what info is to trust?

i need to know not high maths to know relativity proof of the sun gravity bending the starlight is TOTALLY invalid because is expected sun atmosphere will do that

are they hiding light is instant because doesnt bend and tt is posible?

why am i being lied so badly?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64Oh3qEVgBQ

[Outlaw]

Originally Posted by bongodriver

Like that hasn't been said before, OK lets make an example, it seems it bothers you that I am engaging with raaaid in this way, despite the fact it is my right to engage in any way I choose on an open forum, it's down to moderation to police it, I have made it clear many times I think raaaid is a troll and no matter how many times he admits it with the clause of being a friendly troll he is still a troll seeking attention, I find raaaid as annoying as you find me complaining about him annoying, everyone has the right to reply or ignore.

You're doing it wrong.

If you can't and/or won't attack his assinine posts, then ignore him. You're wasting space that could be full of imaginative, bulletin board worthy, and bet winning posts. I had to pay for my own lunch three times during the period he was banned. I can't afford that!


--Outlaw.

[Outlaw]

Originally Posted by raaaid

yes the problem is what info is to trust?

i need to know not high maths to know relativity proof of the sun gravity bending the starlight is TOTALLY invalid because is expected sun atmosphere will do that

OK, if that's the case, PROVE it. How much will the sun's atmosphere bend the light and is that what was observed?

--Outlaw.

[GraveyardJimmy]

Originally Posted by raaaid

are they hiding light is instant because doesnt bend and tt is posible?

Raaaid, if light is instant then how could it refract? Refraction occurs due to differing speeds of the light.

[raaaid]

i dont know as eisntein didnt know for not knowing thickness and density of suns atmosphere

they did it as if the sun had no atmosphere at all

the starlight moved so it was concluded it was gravity period, what about the atmosphere

[raaaid]

Originally Posted by GraveyardJimmy

Raaaid, if light is instant then how could it refract? Refraction occurs due to differing speeds of the light.

if that was true then negative refraction would implied negative refracted light is faster than normal light

refraction is very misterious i dont take mainstream interpretation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_refraction

edit:

anyway the only prove i have light is instant and therefore cause and affect is simultaneous allowing tt is that the bending of light that proves light is slow is false because of sun atmosphere refraction

if something is fake the opposite is truth

[SEE]

Refraction of light through a gas and liquids is caused by a change of speed. We see a 'rainbow' effect because each wavelength (in the spectrum of light) the speed is affected differently and splits.

However, If all the wavelengths that make the spectrum of light were to bend at the same speed then refraction will not occur. This is probably why atmospheric interference was discounted.