|
|
|||||||
| IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover Latest instalment in the acclaimed IL-2 Sturmovik series from award-winning developer Maddox Games. |
| View Poll Results: Do we need new trees? | |||
| Yes, current ones are glittering and have no collision model. |
   
|
71 | 47.65% |
| No, but the collison model added. |
  
|
60 | 40.27% |
| No, they are fine. |
  
|
8 | 5.37% |
| Don't mind the trees. |
  
|
10 | 6.71% |
| Voters: 149. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
10-14-2011, 09:39 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Do we need new trees?
Do we need new trees?
These are them from Rise of flight including damage model:  
__________________
Intel i7 970 6x3.2 ASUS Sabertooth X58 ASUS GTX580 Corsair 12GB 1600 Mhz OZC SSD 120GB Last edited by Bloblast; 10-15-2011 at 03:27 PM. 
|
|
#3
10-14-2011, 09:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tree's having no collision model is a bit awkward of course, but I wouldn't consider it top priority at the moment.
It's till tweaking and performance they have to focus on and having collision models on trees only slows the game down. 
|
|
#4
10-14-2011, 10:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
yes.
these are a performance whore, little overdone, and give a very poor impression of florest areas, tough they look fine by themselfs. we also need bushes, headgrows and all that stuiff missing from england. oh! and colissions!
|
|
#5
10-14-2011, 10:32 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yes. Overall they´re fine, but the array is funny, that´s not much England IMHO.
__________________
X58A UD3R v 2.0 i7 950 @ 4.2GHZ Gigabyte GTX 580 1.5GB @900/1800/4008 Rip Jaws DDR3 2000 6GB FSB 200Mhz/ Memory Bus 1000MHz SSD G.Skill Phoenix Pro 60GB SSD OCZ Revo X2 240GB (flight sims) WD5000AAKS 500GB BX 2250 21,5" 1920x1080@60Hz Sidewinder FFB II Win 7 64 bits Ultimate Corsair 850W
|
|
#7
10-14-2011, 10:37 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
 I would like to say that I am from Britain and unlike the majority of my fellow country men I could not care less about hedgerows, yes they would make it look more like the UK but would they improve the FLIGHT sim... not one iota. Thanks for your time....
__________________
 Quote:
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL. CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10. INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
|
|
#8
10-14-2011, 10:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
i would fix a smiley for you, but i dont want to be rude. have a nice day.
|
|
#9
10-14-2011, 11:44 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL. CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10. INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
|
|
#10
10-15-2011, 05:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't really get the game .. When everyone was told of the game coming out it would be much like the other IL-2 series but improved Then we were told they were starting with a whole new platform Yes the grafixs were great ( For those who could play it ) people were told that they would need top of the line computer to play it .. People with high end PC's ended up having the most problems due to SLI/Crossfire non programs and multi-core issues
grafix vs proformance. Combat Flight Sim vs Arcade ? there will be a limit to any game I'm not even going to get into Rain Fog or the heavy cross winds of dover ... Take the planes and trees and if you hit them you blow up no loss wing anything passed 30 mph or 50 kms
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
